Legal Scholar

Edmund Morris Morgan

Vanderbilt School of Law

Publications

Years Active

Journals

Is this you? Claim these 98 publications to build your verified CiteLaw profile.

Claim this profile

Affiliations

Vanderbilt School of Law 1

Institutions as they appear on this author's publications, most frequent first.

Publishes In

Harvard Law Review34 Yale Law Journal20 Vanderbilt Law Review17 California Law Review4 Columbia Law Review4 Minnesota Law Review4 Washington Law Review4 Michigan Law Review3 Stanford Law Review2 University of Chicago Law Review2

Publications

1960s5

Procedure and Evidence -- 1962 Tennessee Survey

16 VAND. L. REV. 817 (1963) · Vanderbilt Law Review · 1963
Procedure and Evidence -- 1961 Tennessee Survey (II)

15 VAND. L. REV. 921 (1962) · Vanderbilt Law Review · 1962
Practical Difficulties Impeding Reform in the Law of Evidence

14 VAND. L. REV. 725 (1961) · Vanderbilt Law Review · 1961
Procedure and Evidence -- 1961 Tennessee Survey

14 VAND. L. REV. 1353 (1961) · Vanderbilt Law Review · 1961
Procedure and Evidence -- 1960 Tennessee Survey

13 VAND. L. REV. 1197 (1960) · Vanderbilt Law Review · 1960

1950s22

Procedure and Evidence--1959 Tennessee Survey

12 VAND. L. REV. 1281 (1959) · Vanderbilt Law Review · 1959
Procedure and Evidence -- 1958 Tennessee Survey

11 VAND. L. REV. 1339 (1958) · Vanderbilt Law Review · 1958
Rules of Evidence -- Substantive or Procedural?

10 VAND. L. REV. 467 (1957) · Vanderbilt Law Review · 1957
Procedure and Evidence -- 1957 Tennessee Survey

10 VAND. L. REV. 1144 (1957) · Vanderbilt Law Review · 1957
Review Article

56 COLUM. L. REV. 957 (1956) · Columbia Law Review · 1956
Procedure and Evidence -- 1956 Tennessee Survey

9 VAND. L. REV. 1050 (1956) · Vanderbilt Law Review · 1956
Minnesota and the Uniform Rules of Evidence

40 MINN. L. REV. 297 (1956) · Minnesota Law Review · 1956
Review Article

66 YALE L.J. 160 (1956) · Yale Law Journal · 1956
Review Article

55 MICH. L. REV. 317 (1956) · Michigan Law Review · 1956
Basic Problems of Evidence

7 STAN. L. REV. 312 (1955) · Stanford Law Review · 1955
Review Article

53 MICH. L. REV. 1021 (1955) · Michigan Law Review · 1955
Procedure and Evidence -- 1955 Tennessee Survey

8 VAND. L. REV. 1071 (1955) · Vanderbilt Law Review · 1955
Procedure and Evidence -- 1954 Tennessee Survey

7 VAND. L. REV. 895 (1954) · Vanderbilt Law Review · 1954
Procedure and Evidence

6 VAND. L. REV. 1136 (1953) · Vanderbilt Law Review · 1953
The Background of the Uniform Code of Military Justice

6 VAND. L. REV. 169 (1953) · Vanderbilt Law Review · 1953
Declarations Against Interest

5 VAND. L. REV. 451 (1952) · Vanderbilt Law Review · 1952
Book Reviews

5 VAND. L. REV. 672 (1952) · Vanderbilt Law Review · 1952
How to Approach Burden of Proof and Presumptions

25 U. COLO. L. REV. 34 (1952) · University of Colorado Law Review · 1952
Review Article

64 HARV. L. REV. 1215 (1951) · Harvard Law Review · 1951
Burden of Proof and Presumptions in Will Contests in Tennessee

5 VAND. L. REV. 74 (1951) · Vanderbilt Law Review · 1951
Review Article

63 HARV. L. REV. 1474 (1950) · Harvard Law Review · 1950
Review Article

63 HARV. L. REV. 915 (1950) · Harvard Law Review · 1950

1940s14

The Legacy of Sacco and Vanzetti

1 STAN. L. REV. 573 (1949) · Stanford Law Review · 1949
Review Article

58 YALE L.J. 505 (1949) · Yale Law Journal · 1949
Review Article

37 CAL. L. REV. 331 (1949) · California Law Review · 1949
Review Article

61 HARV. L. REV. 914 (1948) · Harvard Law Review · 1948
Hearsay Dangers and the Application of the Hearsay Concept

62 HARV. L. REV. 177 (1948) · Harvard Law Review · 1948
Review Article

47 MICH. L. REV. 289 (1948) · Michigan Law Review · 1948
The Law of Evidence, 1941-1945

59 HARV. L. REV. 481 (1946) · Harvard Law Review · 1946
Judicial Notice

57 HARV. L. REV. 269 (1944) · Harvard Law Review · 1944
Choice of Law Governing Proof

58 HARV. L. REV. 153 (1944) · Harvard Law Review · 1944
A Study of the Law of Opinion Evidence in Illinois

29 VA. L. REV. 970 (1943) · Virginia Law Review · 1943
Suggested Remedy for Obstructions to Expert Testimony by Rules of Evidence

10 U. CHI. L. REV. (1943) · University of Chicago Law Review · 1943
Joseph Warren: A Gentleman Departs

56 HARV. L. REV. 171 (1942) · Harvard Law Review · 1942
Eugene Wambaugh

54 HARV. L. REV. 4 (1940) · Harvard Law Review · 1940
Some Observations Concerning a Model Code of Evidence

89 U. PENN. L. REV. 145 (1940) · University of Pennsylvania Law Review · 1940

1930s25

Review Article

52 HARV. L. REV. 708 (1939) · Harvard Law Review · 1939
Some Suggestions for Defining and Classifying Hearsay

86 U. PENN. L. REV. 258 (1938) · University of Pennsylvania Law Review · 1938
Looking Backward and Forward at Evidence

50 HARV. L. REV. 909 (1937) · Harvard Law Review · 1937
The Jury and the Exclusionary Rules of Evidence

4 U. CHI. L. REV. (1937) · University of Chicago Law Review · 1937
Presumptions

12 WASH. L. REV. 255 (1937) · Washington Law Review · 1937
Admissions

12 WASH. L. REV. 181 (1937) · Washington Law Review · 1937
The Hearsay Rule

12 WASH. L. REV. 1 (1937) · Washington Law Review · 1937
Res Gestae

12 WASH. L. REV. 91 (1937) · Washington Law Review · 1937
Review Article

50 HARV. L. REV. 1211 (1937) · Harvard Law Review · 1937
Review Article

49 HARV. L. REV. 1387 (1936) · Harvard Law Review · 1936
Hearsay and Non-Hearsay

48 HARV. L. REV. 1138 (1935) · Harvard Law Review · 1935
Review Article

44 YALE L.J. 1131 (1935) · Yale Law Journal · 1935
Review Article

23 CAL. L. REV. 462 (1935) · California Law Review · 1935
Review Article

47 HARV. L. REV. 1299 (1934) · Harvard Law Review · 1934
Review Article

48 HARV. L. REV. 366 (1934) · Harvard Law Review · 1934
Review Article

47 HARV. L. REV. 900 (1934) · Harvard Law Review · 1934
Review Article

47 HARV. L. REV. 538 (1934) · Harvard Law Review · 1934
Instructing the Jury upon Presumptions and Burden of Proof

47 HARV. L. REV. 59 (1933) · Harvard Law Review · 1933
Review Article

46 HARV. L. REV. 726 (1933) · Harvard Law Review · 1933
Review Article

46 HARV. L. REV. 1350 (1933) · Harvard Law Review · 1933
Review Article

46 HARV. L. REV. 1203 (1933) · Harvard Law Review · 1933
Some Observations concerning Presumptions

44 HARV. L. REV. 906 (1931) · Harvard Law Review · 1931
Review Article

31 COLUM. L. REV. 1229 (1931) · Columbia Law Review · 1931
Review Article

39 YALE L.J. 440 (1930) · Yale Law Journal · 1930
Review Article

44 HARV. L. REV. 325 (1930) · Harvard Law Review · 1930

1920s28

The Rationale of Vicarious Admissions

42 HARV. L. REV. 461 (1929) · Harvard Law Review · 1929
Functions of Judge and Jury in the Determination of Preliminary Questions of Fact

43 HARV. L. REV. 165 (1929) · Harvard Law Review · 1929
Review Article

43 HARV. L. REV. 158 (1929) · Harvard Law Review · 1929
Review Article

38 YALE L.J. 696 (1929) · Yale Law Journal · 1929
Review Article

17 CAL. L. REV. 584 (1929) · California Law Review · 1929
Review Article

37 YALE L.J. 541 (1928) · Yale Law Journal · 1928
Review Article

16 CAL. L. REV. 354 (1928) · California Law Review · 1928
Review Article

41 HARV. L. REV. 939 (1928) · Harvard Law Review · 1928
Review Article

28 COLUM. L. REV. 391 (1928) · Columbia Law Review · 1928
Review Article

40 HARV. L. REV. 1158 (1927) · Harvard Law Review · 1927
Review Article

40 HARV. L. REV. 802 (1927) · Harvard Law Review · 1927
The Relation between Hearsay and Preserved Memory

40 HARV. L. REV. 712 (1927) · Harvard Law Review · 1927
Review Article

27 COLUM. L. REV. 343 (1927) · Columbia Law Review · 1927
Review Article

37 YALE L.J. 279 (1927) · Yale Law Journal · 1927
Review Article

40 HARV. L. REV. 1164 (1927) · Harvard Law Review · 1927
Review Article

40 HARV. L. REV. 1029 (1927) · Harvard Law Review · 1927
Review Article

33 YALE L.J. 336 (1924) · Yale Law Journal · 1924
Review Article

34 YALE L.J. 223 (1924) · Yale Law Journal · 1924
Review Article

34 YALE L.J. 216 (1924) · Yale Law Journal · 1924
Review Article

32 YALE L.J. 420 (1923) · Yale Law Journal · 1923
A BRIEF HISTORY OF SPECIAL VERDICTS AND SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES

32 YALE L.J. 575 (1923) · Yale Law Journal · 1923
Review Article

31 YALE L.J. 567 (1922) · Yale Law Journal · 1922
Review Article

32 YALE L.J. 97 (1922) · Yale Law Journal · 1922
Review Article

31 YALE L.J. 456 (1922) · Yale Law Journal · 1922
A SUGGESTED CLASSIFICATION OF UTTERANCES ADMISSIBLE AS RES GESTAE

31 YALE L.J. 229 (1922) · Yale Law Journal · 1922
ADMISSIONS AS AN EXCEPTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE

30 YALE L.J. 355 (1921) · Yale Law Journal · 1921
Court-Marital Jurisdiction over Non-Military Persons under the Articles of War

4 MINN. L. REV. 79 (1920) · Minnesota Law Review · 1920
Review Article

29 YALE L.J. 818 (1920) · Yale Law Journal · 1920

1910s4

Review Article

28 YALE L.J. 845 (1919) · Yale Law Journal · 1919
THE EXISTING COURT-MARTIAL SYSTEM AND THE ANSELL ARMY ARTICLES

29 YALE L.J. 52 (1919) · Yale Law Journal · 1919
Judicial Regulation of Court Procedure

2 MINN. L. REV. 81 (1918) · Minnesota Law Review · 1918
Benefit to the Promisor as Consideration for a Second Promise of the Same Act

1 MINN. L. REV. 383 (1917) · Minnesota Law Review · 1917

Are you Edmund Morris Morgan?

This page was assembled from published law review and journal records. Claim your work to turn it into a verified CiteLaw scholar profile, correct anything that is wrong, and add abstracts or full text where they are missing.

Claim your work Browse all scholars