The Hearsay Rule

Morgan, Edmund M.

Journal: Washington Law Review

Volume: 12

First Page: 1

Year: 1937

Bluebook Citation: 12 WASH. L. REV. 1 (1937)

Author: Edmund Morris Morgan: all 98 publications


Abstract

Any attempt to define a legal concept makes advisable an inquiry into its origin and evolution. If it be a substantive law concept, the social purpose that is designed to serve—whether the avoidance of evils or the creation or furtherance of positive benefits—must be considered. If it be a concept of procedural law, the functions it is, or is thought to be, designed to perform in the process of reaching the factual and legal bases for satisfactory determination of disputes between litigants must be examined. It is proposed, therefore, first to look briefly at the causes which brought the hearsay rule into being, next to consider the dangers in testimony that it is designed to eliminate or limit, then to discuss the commnonly accepted statements, and finally to suggest a revised definition.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.