The United States Supreme Court Resolves the Effect of Disability Benefit Claims upon Americans with Disabilities Act Complaints in Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corporation

O'Brien, Christine Neylon

Journal: Hofstra Labor & Employment Law Journal

Volume: 17

Year: 1999

Bluebook Citation: 17 HOFSTRA LAB. & EMP. L.J. (1999)

Author: Christine Neylon O'Brien: all 19 publications


Abstract

Federal courts have grappled with the issue of whether claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act should be barred, or judicially estopped, by the plaintiff's earlier application for or receipt of disability benefits. This is a particularly vexing problem since recipients of disability benefits are presumed to be disabled even though they are not disabled for a particular job. These individuals, who are social security recipients and still, are qualified for a job yet they suffer adverse employment decisions in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. This article clarifies the law based on the Supreme Court decision, Cleveland v. Policy Mgmt.

Systems Corp., finding that recipients of social security should not be precluded from pursuit of claims under the disability laws. This decision best effectuates the goals of protecting the disabled while promoting full participation in the workforce for all Americans.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.