The Senate: Out of Order Is Our Constitutional Order Broken - Structural and Doctrinal Questions in Constitutional Law: The Use of the Filibuster and Potential Senate Reform

Bruhl, Aaron-Andrew P.

Journal: Connecticut Law Review

Year: 2011

Bluebook Citation: CONN. L. REV.

Author: Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl: all 19 publications


Abstract

Due to the routine use of the filibuster and related devices, today’s Senate operates as a supermajoritarian body. This Symposium Article considers whether this supermajoritarian aspect of the Senate renders it dysfunctional and, if so, what can be done about it. I contend that the Senate is indeed broken. Its current supermajoritarian features have pernicious effects.

Further, and contrary to the claims of many of the Senate’s defenders, this aspect of the Senate is not part of the original design. I go on to explain why the Senate’s procedures, despite their deficiencies, have nonetheless proven resistant to reform. The impediment to change is not based in law but instead derives largely from legislators’ incentives. I close by discussing whether and how those incentives could be altered.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.