Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl

Publications

• Understanding the Mechanisms of Interpretive Change
  103 N. C. L. REV. 1083 (2025) · North Carolina Law Review · 2025
• Supreme Court Litigators in the Age of Textualism
  76 FLA. L. REV. 59 (2024) · Florida Law Review · 2024
• Interpreting State Statutes in Federal Court
  98 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 61 (2022) · Notre Dame Law Review · 2022
• Eager To Follow: Methodological Precedent in Statutory Interpretation
  99 N. C. L. REV. 101 (2020) · North Carolina Law Review · 2020
• The Remand Power and the Supreme Court's Role
  96 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 171 (2020) · Notre Dame Law Review · 2020

• Statutory Interpretation and the Rest of the Iceberg: Divergences Between the Lower Federal Courts and the Supreme Court
  68 DUKE L.J. (2018) · Duke Law Journal · 2018
• One Good Plaintiff Is Not Enough
  67 DUKE L.J. 481 (2017) · Duke Law Journal · 2017
• The Jurisdiction Canon
  70 VAND. L. REV. 499 (2017) · Vanderbilt Law Review · 2017
• Communicating the Canons: How Lower Courts React When the Supreme Court Changes the Rules of Statutory Interpretation
  100 MINN. L. REV. 481 (2015) · Minnesota Law Review · 2015
• Hierarchically Variable Deference to Agency Interpretations
  89 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 727 (2014) · Notre Dame Law Review · 2014
• Following Lower-Court Precedent
  81 U. CHI. L. REV. (2014) · University of Chicago Law Review · 2014
• Hierarchy and Heterogeneity: How to Read a Statute in a Lower Court
  97 CORNELL L. REV. 433 (2012) · Cornell Law Review · 2012
• Elected Judges and Statutory Interpretation
  79 U. CHI. L. REV. (2012) · University of Chicago Law Review · 2012
• Deciding When to Decide: How Appellate Procedure Distributes the Costs of Legal Change
  96 CORNELL L. REV. 203 (2011) · Cornell Law Review · 2011
• The Senate: Out of Order Is Our Constitutional Order Broken - Structural and Doctrinal Questions in Constitutional Law: The Use of the Filibuster and Potential Senate Reform
  Connecticut Law Review · 2011

• The Supreme Court's Controversial GVRs - And an Alternative
  107 MICH. L. REV. 711 (2009) · Michigan Law Review · 2009
• Against Mix-and-Match Lawmaking
  16 CORNELL J. L. & PUB. POL'Y 349 (2007) · Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy · 2007
• If the Judicial Confirmation Process Is Broken, Can a Statute Fix It?
  85 NEB. L. REV. (2007) · Nebraska Law Review · 2007
• Justice Unconceived: How Posterity Has Rights
  14 YALE J. L. & HUMAN. 393 (2003) · Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities · 2003