Escape from New York: Analyzing the State's Relative Interests in Proscribing the Withdrawal of Life Support and Physician-Assisted Suicide

Miller, Colin

Journal: William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

Volume: 11

First Page: 779

Year: 2003

Bluebook Citation: 11 WM. & MARY BILL RTS. J. 779 (2003)

Author: C. Douglas Miller: all 26 publications


Abstract

This Note argues that states cannot consistently prohibit physician assisted suicide for terminally ill patients while they continue to allow the withdrawal of life support for even non-terminal patients. All of the state interests identified by the Supreme Court in rejecting a right to assisted suicide are implicated to a higher degree by withdrawal of life support. The primary reason for this difference is that withdrawal of life support often involves incompetent patients and surrogate decision making while assisted suicide by definition requires a competent patient choosing to hasten her death

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.