C. Douglas Miller

Publications

• Innocence Is Different: Why Victim Impact Statements Should be Inadmissible at Wrongful Conviction Hearings
  55 U. BALT. L. F. (2025) · University of Baltimore Law Forum · 2025
• A Constitutional Right to Exclude Evidence
  12 TEX. A & M L. REV. 317 (2024) · Texas A&M Law Review · 2024
• A New Test for the New Crime Exception
  2023 UTAH L. REV. (2023) · Utah Law Review · 2023
• The Real McCoy: Defining the Defendant’s Right to Autonomy in the Wake of McCoy v. Louisiana
  53 LOY. U. CHI. L.J. 405 (2022) · Loyola University Chicago Law Journal · 2022

• Reciprocal Immunity
  93 IND. L.J. (2018) · Indiana Law Journal · 2018
• Sovereign Impunity: Why Double Jeopardy Should Apply in Puerto Rico
  73 WASH. & LEE L. REV. ONLINE 174 (2016) · Washington and Lee Law Review Online · 2016
• Contents May Have Shifted: Disentangling the Best Evidence Rule from the Rule Against Hearsay
  71 WASH. & LEE L. REV. ONLINE 180 (2014) · Washington and Lee Law Review Online · 2014
• Justice of the Peace: Why Federal Rule of Evidence 404(A)(2)(C) Should Be Repealed
  91 N. C. L. REV. 1161 (2013) · North Carolina Law Review · 2013
• No Explanation Required: A Reply to Jeffrey Bellin's eHearsay
  98 MINN. L. REV. HEADNOTES 34 (2013) · Minnesota Law Review Headnotes · 2013
• Avoiding a Confrontation?: How Courts Have Erred in Finding That Nontestimonial Hearsay Is Beyond the Scope of the <i>Bruton</i> Doctrine
  77 BROOK. L. REV. (2012) · Brooklyn Law Review · 2012
• A Tribute to David Leonard
  43 LOY. L. A. L. REV. 744 (2010) · Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review · 2010
• Crossing Over: Why Attorneys (and Judges) Should Not be Able to Cross-Examine Witnesses Regarding Their Immigration Statuses for Impeachment Purposes
  Northwestern University Law Review · 2010
• Lawyers, Guns, and Money: Why the Tiahrt Amendment’s Ban on the Admissibility of ATF Trace Data in State Court Actions Violates the Commerce Clause and the Tenth Amendment
  2010 UTAH L. REV. (2010) · Utah Law Review · 2010

• Impeachable Offenses?: Why Civil Parties in Quasi-Criminal Cases Should Be Treated Like Criminal Defendants Under the Felony Impeachment Rule
  36 PEPP. L. REV. (2009) · Pepperdine Law Review · 2009
• "Manifest" Destiny?: How Some Courts Have Fallaciously Come To Require a Greater Showing of Congressional Intent for Jurisdictional Exhaustion Than They Require for Preemption
  2008 BYU L. REV. 169 (2008) · BYU Law Review · 2008
• Ordeal By Innocence: Why There Should Be a Wrongful Incarceration/Execution Exception to Attorney-Client Confidentiality
  Northwestern University Law Review · 2008
• Even Better Than the Real Thing: How Courts Have Been Anything but Liberal in Finding Genuine Questions Raised as to the Authenticity of Originals Under Rule 1003
  68 MD. L. REV. 168 (2008) · Maryland Law Review · 2008
• A Shock to the System: Analyzing the Conflict Among Courts over Whether and When Excited Utterances May Follow Subsequent Startling Occurrences in Rape and Sexual Assault Cases
  12 WM. & MARY J. RACE GENDER & SOC. JUST. 49 (2005) · William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice · 2005
• Banishment from within and Without: Analyzing Indigenous Sentencing under International Human Rights Standards
  80 N. D. L. REV. 253 (2004) · North Dakota Law Review · 2004
• Death by Any Other Name: The Federal Government's Inconsistent Treatment of Drugs Used in Lethal Injections and Physician-Assisted Suicide
  17 J. L. & HEALTH 217 (2003) · Journal of Law and Health · 2003
• A Wolf in Sheep's Clothing: Wolf versus Ashcroft and the Constitutionality of using the MPAA Ratings to Censor Films in Prison
  6 VAND. J. ENT. & TECH. L. 265 (2003) · Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law · 2003
• Escape from New York: Analyzing the State's Relative Interests in Proscribing the Withdrawal of Life Support and Physician-Assisted Suicide
  11 WM. & MARY BILL RTS. J. 779 (2003) · William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal · 2003

• Will Formality, Judicial Formalism, and Legislative Reform: An Examination of the Uniform Probate Code "Harmless Error" Rule and the Movement Toward Amorphism Part Two: Uniform Probate Code Sec. 2-503 and a Counterproposal
  43 FLA. L. REV. 599 (1991) · Florida Law Review · 1991
• Will Formality, Judicial Formalism, and Legislative Reform: An Examination of the Uniform Probate Code "Harmless Error" Rule and the Movement Toward Amorphism Part One: The Wills Act Formula, the Rite of Testation, and the Question of Intent: A Problem in Search of a Solution.
  43 FLA. L. REV. 167 (1991) · Florida Law Review · 1991

• Dying with the "Living" (or"Revocable") Trust: Federal Tax Consequences of Testamentary Dispositions Compared
  37 VAND. L. REV. 811 (1984) · Vanderbilt Law Review · 1984

• Recommended Reading in Taxation
  30 FLA. L. REV. 222 (1977) · Florida Law Review · 1977