Deal Protection Provisions in the Last Period of Play

Griffith, Sean J.

Journal: Fordham Law Review

Volume: 71

First Page: 1899

Year: 2003

Bluebook Citation: 71 FORDHAM L. REV. 1899 (2003)

Author: Sean J. Griffith: all 27 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
2
Citing decisions
1
Courts citing
Most recently cited by2
  • 2025In re Dura Medic Consolidation Litigation Del. Ch.
  • 2021Firefighters' Pension System of the City of Kansas City, Missouri Trust v. Presidio, Inc. Del. Ch.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

The ability to protect mergers is important to both targets and acquirors. A series of recent Chancery Court decisions, however, challenges the validity of deal protection provisions in merger agreements and threatens the stability of Delaware's established change of control paradigm. This article argues that last period concerns animate the Chancery Court's decisions and finds, in the last period problem, a theoretical principle capable of harmonizing these decisions with existing jurisprudence and providing a coherent approach to the practical problems raised by deal protection provisions.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.