Sean J. Griffith

Publications

• What’s “Controversial” About ESG? A Theory of Compelled Commercial Speech Under the First Amendment
  101 NEB. L. REV. (2023) · Nebraska Law Review · 2023
• A Friend to the Law School, In Memoriam
  Connecticut Law Review · 2022
• Who Makes ESG? Understanding Stakeholders in the ESG Debate
  26 FORDHAM J. CORP. & FIN. L. 277 (2021) · Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law · 2021
• A Mission Statement for Mutual Funds in Shareholder Litigation
  87 U. CHI. L. REV. (2020) · University of Chicago Law Review · 2020
• Deal Insurance: Representation and Warranty Insurance in Mergers and Acquisitions
  104 MINN. L. REV. 1839 (2020) · Minnesota Law Review · 2020
• Global Investor Protection: Securities Law Enforcement Around the World
  25 FORDHAM J. CORP. & FIN. L. 303 (2020) · Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law · 2020
• Does <em>Revlon</em> Matter? An Empirical and Theoretical Study
  108 CAL. L. REV. 1683 (2020) · California Law Review · 2020

• Innovation in Disclosure-Based Shareholder Suits
  69 CASE W. RES. L. REV. 927 (2019) · Case Western Reserve Law Review · 2019
• What Would We Do Without Them: Whistleblowers in the Era of Sarbanes-Oxley and Dodd-Frank
  23 FORDHAM J. CORP. & FIN. L. 379 (2018) · Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law · 2018
• Political Corruption: Afflicting America and Affairs Abroad
  22 FORDHAM J. CORP. & FIN. L. 501 (2017) · Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law · 2017
• Objections to Disclosure Settlements: A How-To Guide
  70 OKLA. L. REV. 281 (2017) · Oklahoma Law Review · 2017
• Dead Hand Proxy Puts and Shareholder Value
  84 U. CHI. L. REV. (2017) · University of Chicago Law Review · 2017
• The Sixteenth Annual Albert A. DeStefano Lecture on Corporate, Securities & Financial Law at the Fordham Corporate Law Center
  22 FORDHAM J. CORP. & FIN. L. (2017) · Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law · 2017
• The Question Concerning Technology in Compliance
  11 BROOK. J. CORP. FIN. & COM. L. (2016) · Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law · 2016
• Corporate Governance in an Era of Compliance
  57 WM. & MARY L. REV. 2075 (2016) · William & Mary Law Review · 2016
• The Changing Face of Corporate Compliance and Corporate Governance
  21 FORDHAM J. CORP. & FIN. L. (2016) · Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law · 2016
• The Fifteenth Annual A.A. Sommer, Jr. Lecture on Corporate, Securities & Financial Law at the Fordham Corporate Law Center
  20 FORDHAM J. CORP. & FIN. L. 623 (2015) · Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law · 2015
• The Fourteenth Annual Albert A. DeStefano Lecture On Corporate, Securities & Financial Law At The Fordham Corporate Law Center
  20 FORDHAM J. CORP. & FIN. L. 349 (2015) · Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law · 2015
• Substituted Compliance and Systemic Risk: How to Make a Global Market in Derivatives Regulation
  98 MINN. L. REV. 1291 (2014) · Minnesota Law Review · 2014
• The Thirteenth Annual A.A. Sommer, Jr. Lecture on Corporate, Securities & Financial Law at the Fordham Corporate Law Center
  19 FORDHAM J. CORP. & FIN. L. 273 (2013) · Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law · 2013
• The Market for Preclusion in Merger Litigation
  66 VAND. L. REV. 1053 (2013) · Vanderbilt Law Review · 2013
• Governing Systemic Risk: Towards a Governance Structure for Derivatives Clearinghouses
  61 EMORY L.J. 1153 (2012) · Emory Law Journal · 2012

• Predicting Corporate Governance Risk: Evidence from the Directors' & Officers' Liability Insurance Market
  74 U. CHI. L. REV. (2007) · University of Chicago Law Review · 2007
• Daedalean Tinkering
  104 MICH. L. REV. 1247 (2006) · Michigan Law Review · 2006
• Good Faith Business Judgment: A Theory of Rhetoric in Corporate Law Jurisprudence
  55 DUKE L.J. (2005) · Duke Law Journal · 2005
• Spinning and Underpricing: A Legal and Economic Analysis of the Preferential Allocation of Shares in Initial Public Offerings
  69 BROOK. L. REV. 583 (2004) · Brooklyn Law Review · 2004
• Deal Protection Provisions in the Last Period of Play
  71 FORDHAM L. REV. 1899 (2003) · Fordham Law Review · 2003