Michael H. Graham

Publications

• <em>Crawford/Davis</em> "Testimonial" Interpreted, Removing the Clutter: Application Summary
  62 U. MIAMI L. REV. 811 (2008) · University of Miami Law Review · 2008
• Sir Richard Hausler
  55 U. MIAMI L. REV. 343 (2001) · University of Miami Law Review · 2001
• The Expert Witness Predicament: Determining "Reliable" Under the Gatekeeping Test of <em>Daubert</em>, <em>Kumho</em>, and Proposed Amended Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence
  54 U. MIAMI L. REV. 317 (2000) · University of Miami Law Review · 2000

• The Reliability of Expert Psychological Testimony in Child Sexual Abuse Prosecutions
  15 CARDOZO L. REV. 2027 (1994) · Cardozo Law Review · 1994
• Foreword
  48 U. MIAMI L. REV. 257 (1993) · University of Miami Law Review · 1993

• Foreword
  42 U. MIAMI L. REV. 829 (1988) · University of Miami Law Review · 1988
• The Confrontation Clause, the Hearsay Rule, and Child Sexual Abuse Prosecutions: The State of the Relationship
  72 MINN. L. REV. 523 (1988) · Minnesota Law Review · 1988
• Child Sexual Abuse Prosecutions: The Current State of the Art
  40 U. MIAMI L. REV. 1 (1985) · University of Miami Law Review · 1985
• Indicia of Reliability and Face to Face Confrontation: Emerging Issues in Child Sexual Abuse Prosecutions
  40 U. MIAMI L. REV. 19 (1985) · University of Miami Law Review · 1985
• Witness Intimidation
  12 FLA. ST. U. L. REV. 239 (1984) · Florida State University Law Review · 1984
• Review Article
  82 MICH. L. REV. 1131 (1984) · Michigan Law Review · 1984
• One Day/One Trial or a One Week Term of Jury Service: The Misleading Marketing of Modern Jury Management Systems
  45 MO. L. REV. (1980) · Missouri Law Review · 1980

• Pattern Jury Instructions: The Prospect of over or Undercompensation in Damage Awards for Personal Injuries
  28 DEPAUL L. REV. 33 (1979) · DePaul Law Review · 1979
• Prior Consistent Statements: Rule 801(d)(1)(B) of the Federal Rules of Evidence, Critique and Proposal
  30 UC L.J. 575 (1979) · UC Law Journal · 1979
• Employing Inconsistent Statements for Impeachment and as Substantive Evidence: A Critical Review and Proposed Amendments of Federal Rules of Evidence 801 ( d ) ( 1 ) ( A ), 613, and 607
  75 MICH. L. REV. 1565 (1977) · Michigan Law Review · 1977
• Impeaching the Professional Expert Witness by a Showing of Financial Interest
  53 IND. L.J. (1977) · Indiana Law Journal · 1977