Relationship to other laws
United States Code
Citation analytics
How this statute sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
★Highly CitedTop 1% most-cited · cited by 104 decisions
104
Citing decisions
6+
Courts citing
Citations by decade
16
34
37
17
1990s2000s2010s2020s
Courts citing this statute
Most recently cited by10
- 2026Tessa Warren, individually and in her capacity as Administratrix of the Estate of Kevin M. Warren v. Appalachian Power Company (Judge White, concurring)
- 2026Town of Superior v. Board of County Commissioners of Jefferson County Colo. Ct. App.
- 2026PARAGON v. STATE Ariz. Ct. App.
- 2025Bevacqua v. Hillsboro Aero Academy, LLC D. Or.
- 2025Scaletta v. Michels Power, Inc. N.Y. App. Div.
- 2025Odynocki v. Delta Air Lines Inc E.D. La.
- 2024Furnas v. Appalachian Power Company S.D.W. Va
- 2024Bradshaw v. American Airlines 10th Cir.
- 2024United States v. Jay Liestman 7th Cir.
- 2024Schoene v. Spirit Airlines, Inc. D. Or.
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Text
Except as provided in the International Navigational Rules Act of 1977 (33 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.), the navigation and shipping laws of the United States and the rules for the prevention of collisions do not apply to aircraft or to the navigation of vessels related to those aircraft. an international arrangement gives the United States Government authority to make the extension; and the President decides the extension is in the national interest. A remedy under this part is in addition to any other remedies provided by law. The President may extend (in the way and for periods the President considers necessary) the application of this part to outside the United States when— (Source: (Pub. L. 103–272, § 1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1117.))