Reassumption of jurisdiction over child custody proceedings
United States Code
Citation analytics
How this statute sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Frequently CitedTop 11% most-cited · cited by 19 decisions
19
Citing decisions
6+
Courts citing
Citations by decade
5
5
5
4
1980s1990s2000s2010s
Courts citing this statute
Most recently cited by10
- 2018People ex rel. Becerra v. Huber Cal. App. Ct.
- 2018P. ex rel. etc. v. Huber 9/2518 CA1/4 Case Details Cal. Ct. App.
- 2015Doe v. Doe Idaho
- 2011State v. Native Village of Tanana Alaska
- 2007Cherokee Nation v. Nomura Okla.
- 2006Siskiyou County Human Services/Adult & Children's Services Department v. Karuk Tribe Cal. Ct. App.
- 2005Doe v. Mann 9th Cir.
- 2003Doe v. Mann N.D. Cal.
- 2001In re C.R.H. Alaska
- 1999John v. Baker Alaska
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Text
Any Indian tribe which became subject to State jurisdiction pursuant to the provisions of the Act of August 15, 1953 (67 Stat. 588), as amended by title IV of the Act of April 11, 1968 (82 Stat. 73, 78), or pursuant to any other Federal law, may reassume jurisdiction over child custody proceedings. Before any Indian tribe may reassume jurisdiction over Indian child custody proceedings, such tribe shall present to the Secretary for approval a petition to reassume such jurisdiction which includes a suitable plan to exercise such jurisdiction. whether or not the tribe maintains a membership roll or alternative provision for clearly identifying the persons who will be affected by the reassumption of jurisdiction by the tribe; the size of the reservation or former reservation area which will be affected by retrocession and reassumption of jurisdiction by the tribe; the population base of the tribe, or distribution of the population in homogeneous communities or geographic areas; and the feasibility of the plan in cases of multitribal occupation of a single reservation or geographic area. In those cases where the Secretary determines that the jurisdictional provisions of section 1911(a) of this title are not feasible, he is authorized to accept partial retrocession which will enable tribes to exercise referral jurisdiction as provided in section 1911(b) of this title, or, where appropriate, will allow them to exercise exclusive jurisdiction as provided in section 1911(a) of this title over limited community or geographic areas without regard for the reservation status of the area affected. If the Secretary approves any petition under subsection (a), the Secretary shall publish notice of such approval in the Federal Register and shall notify the affected State or States of such approval. The Indian tribe concerned shall reassume jurisdiction sixty days after publication in the Federal Register of notice of approval. If the Secretary disapproves any petition under subsection (a), the Secretary shall provide such technical assistance as may be necessary to enable the tribe to correct any deficiency which the Secretary identified as a cause for disapproval. Assumption of jurisdiction under this section shall not affect any action or proceeding over which a court has already assumed jurisdiction, except as may be provided pursuant to any agreement under section 1919 of this title. In considering the petition and feasibility of the plan of a tribe under subsection (a), the Secretary may consider, among other things: (Source: (Pub. L. 95–608, title I, § 108, Nov. 8, 1978, 92 Stat. 3074.))