Prohibition against discharging, disciplining or discriminating against employees. (a) General rule.-- No person shall discharge, discipline or in any manner discriminate against any employee
Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes
Section: 1619
Jurisdiction: PA
Bluebook Citation: 75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1619
§ 1619. Prohibition against discharging, disciplining or discriminating against employees. (a) General rule.-- No person shall discharge, discipline or in any manner discriminate against any employee
with respect to the employee's compensation, terms, conditions or privileges of employment
because such employee, or person acting pursuant to a request of the employee: (1) refuses to operate a commercial motor vehicle which is not in compliance with the
provisions of 67 Pa. Code Ch. 231 (relating to intrastate motor carrier safety requirements)
and existing safety laws; or (2) has filed any complaint or instituted or caused to be instituted any proceeding relating
to a violation of a commercial motor vehicle safety rule, regulation, standard or
order or has testified or is about to testify in any such proceeding. (b) Unsafe conditions.-- No person shall discharge, discipline or in any manner discriminate against an employee
with respect to the employee's compensation, terms, conditions or privileges of employment
for refusing to operate a vehicle when such operation constitutes a violation of any
Federal rules, regulations, standards or orders applicable to commercial motor vehicle
safety or health, or because of the employee's reasonable apprehension of serious
injury to himself or the public due to the unsafe condition of such equipment. The
unsafe conditions causing the employee's apprehension of injury must be of such nature
that a reasonable person, under the circumstances then confronting the employee, would
conclude that there is a bona fide danger of an accident, injury or serious impairment
of health resulting from the unsafe condition. In order to qualify for protection
under this subsection, the employee must have sought from his employer and have been
unable to obtain correction of the unsafe condition. (c) Procedure.-- (1) Any employee who believes he has been discharged, disciplined or otherwise discriminated
against by any person in violation of subsection (a) or (b) may, within 180 days after
such alleged violation occurs, file or have filed by any person on the employee's
behalf a complaint with a magisterial district judge alleging such discharge, discipline
or discrimination. Actions brought under this section shall be brought in the court
of common pleas if the complaint states a claim for damages in excess of the jurisdictional
limits provided by 42 Pa.C.S. § 1515 (relating to jurisdiction and venue) and the
plaintiff declines to waive the portion of his claim exceeding the jurisdictional
amount. (2) Upon request of the employee, the employer or any representative of the employee or
employer, the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission shall assign and direct an investigator
with qualifications in motor vehicle safety inspections to examine the vehicle or
vehicles in question and render a signed report. Such report shall be prima facie
evidence of the facts and the conclusions contained therein, and may be introduced
in a legal proceeding brought under this section. Any party may call the investigator
as if on cross examination in a legal proceeding brought under this section. (3) If the magisterial district judge or the court of common pleas, after notice and hearing,
determines that a violation of subsection (a) or (b) has occurred, the magisterial
district judge or court of common pleas has the power to and shall order: (i) the person who committed such violation to take affirmative action to abate the violation; (ii) such person to reinstate the complainant to the complainant's former position together
with the compensation, including back pay, terms, conditions and privileges of the
complainant's employment; and (iii) compensatory damages. (4) If an order is issued under paragraph (3), the magisterial district judge or court
of common pleas issuing the order, at the request of the complainant, may assess against
the person against whom the order is issued a sum equal to the aggregate amount of
all costs and expenses, including attorney fees, reasonably incurred by the complainant
for, or in connection with, the bringing of the complaint upon which the order was
issued. (d) Review of order.-- Any person adversely affected or aggrieved by an order issued after a hearing under
subsection (c) may obtain review of the order in accordance with the provisions of
42 Pa.C.S. (relating to judiciary and judicial procedure). (e) Enforcement of order.-- Whenever a person has failed to comply with an order issued under subsection (c)(3),
an aggrieved party may file a civil action or seek an enforcement order in the court
of common pleas for the district in which the violation was found to occur in order
to enforce such order. In actions brought under this subsection, the court of common
pleas shall have jurisdiction to grant all appropriate relief, including injunctive
relief, reinstatement and compensatory damages. (July 10, 1990, P.L.356, No.83, eff. 60 days; Dec. 7, 1990, P.L.635, No.164, eff.
imd.; Nov. 30, 2004, P.L.1618, No.207, eff. 60 days) 2004 Amendment. Act 207 amended subsec. (c)(1), (3) and (4). See section 29 of Act 207 in the appendix
to this title for special provisions relating to construction of law. 1990 Amendments. Act 83 added section 1619 and Act 164 amended subsecs. (c), (d) and (e).
Chat with this statute using AI
Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this statute, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.