Summary Judgment Procedure
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
(a) Moving Party’s Obligations. A party moving for summary judgment must separately file: (1) (2) (3) a motion; a supporting brief; a Statement of Material Facts with numbered paragraphs for each material fact the moving party contends is undisputed which includes: (A) (B) a short statement of each fact; and a citation to evidence supporting each fact; and (4) the Notice in Appendix C, if an opposing party is unrepresented. (b) Opposing Party’s Obligations. A party opposing the motion must, within twenty-eight days after the moving party served the motion, separately file: (1) (2) A response brief; and a Response to Statement of Material Facts which includes: (A) (B) (C) (D) a verbatim restatement of the Statement of Material Facts; a correspondingly numbered response immediately following each paragraph of the Statement of Material Facts; a citation to evidence supporting each dispute of fact; and additional facts in a section titled Additional Material Facts with numbered paragraphs continuing the sequential numbering of the Statement of Material Facts for each additional material fact the opposing party contends is undisputed which includes: (i) a short statement of each fact; and Local Rules |Northern District of Indiana Page | 46 (ii) a citation to evidence supporting each fact.
(3) In cases where any party is unrepresented, the opposing party is not required to restate verbatim the Statement of Material Facts. (c) Reply. The moving party may, within fourteen days after a response is served, separately file: Civil Rule 56-1 (1) (2) A reply brief; and A Reply to Statement of Additional Material Facts which includes: (A) (B) a verbatim restatement of the Statement of Additional Material Facts; a correspondingly numbered response immediately following each paragraph of the Statement of Additional Material Facts; and (C) a citation to evidence supporting each dispute of additional fact. (3) In cases where any party is unrepresented, the moving party is not required to restate verbatim the Statement of Additional Material Facts.
(d) (e) (f) (g) Additional Briefs. Additional briefs must not be filed without leave of court. Citations to the Record. The court may find a fact is not supported if the citation does not include a page or paragraph number to evidence in the record which can be presented in an admissible form unless the court may take judicial notice of the fact.
Disputes About Evidence. Disputes about the admissibility or materiality of evidence must be raised in the parties’ briefs. A separate motion to strike must not be filed. Oral Argument.
The court will decide summary-judgment motions without oral argument unless a request under L.R. 7-5 is granted or the court directs otherwise. Local Rules Advisory Committee Comments Re: 2022 Amendment The amendment assists the court with identifying genuinely disputed facts by requiring facts to be presented in separately numbered paragraphs and for responses to be in correspondingly numbered paragraphs. Normally, a fact will either be admitted or denied with a citation to evidence supporting the dispute unless the fact can be judicially noticed. The Committee recognized that pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro.
56(c)(1)(B), a party need not always point to specific record materials. See also Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 323 (1986) (“[W]e find no express or implied requirement in Rule 56 that the moving party support its motion with affidavits or other similar materials negating the opponent’s claim.”). Thus, 56-1(a)(3)(b) only requires a moving party to provide a citation for each fact, not for Local Rules |Northern District of Indiana Page | 47 allegations of the absence of a fact. Civil Rule 56-1 The amendment removes the provision that disputes about admissibility be addressed in a separate motion.
Consistent with the 2010 amendment to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c)(2), disputes about inadmissibility and immateriality must be presented in a brief. See Rule 56 Advisory Committee Notes 2010 Amendment. The amendment does not require a verbatim restatement in cases with an unrepresented party, but such cases still require responses with correspondingly numbered paragraphs. The amendment clarifies there is no provision for briefing other than a supporting brief, a response brief, and a reply brief without leave of court.
The Committee considered whether the rule should provide for cases with cross-motions for summary judgment, but concluded they would be better addressed in individualized case-management plans. The Committee recognizes that summary judgment motion practice may vary substantially from case to case. The Court always has the option to modify or suspend the application of a particular local rule in the interest of justice. Parties are encouraged to propose alternative procedures, either in case management plans, by motion, or during status conferences.
Local Rules |Northern District of Indiana Page | 48 Civil Rule 65-1
Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this local rule, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.