Service of Resolution Advocate.
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California
No Resolution Advocate may serve in any Matter in violation of the standards set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 455. An attorney Resolution Advocate shall also promptly determine all conflicts or potential conflicts in the same manner as an attorney would under the California Rules of Professional Conduct if any party to the dispute were a client. A non-attorney Resolution Advocate shall promptly determine all conflicts or potential conflicts in the same manner as under the applicable rules pertaining to the Resolution Advocate’s profession. If the Resolution Advocate’s firm has represented one or more of the parties, the Resolution Advocate shall promptly disclose that circumstance to all parties in writing.
A party who believes that the assigned Resolution Advocate has a conflict of interest shall promptly bring the matter to the attention of the Resolution Advocate. If the Resolution Advocate does not withdraw from the assignment, the matter shall be brought to the attention of the Court by the Resolution Advocate or any of the parties. BKR 58 (Effective May 4, 2026) 9045-1. Dispute Resolution Procedures.
(a) Availability of Resolution Advocate. Promptly after appointment, a Resolution Advocate not available to serve in the Matter shall notify the parties, the alternate Resolution Advocate, and the BDRP Administrator’s staff assistant of that unavailability. The alternate Resolution Advocate shall thereafter serve as the Resolution Advocate. (b) Initial Telephonic Conference.
As soon as practicable after notification of appointment, the Resolution Advocate shall conduct a telephonic conference with counsel for the parties to provide preliminary information to the Resolution Advocate concerning the nature of the Matter, the expectations of the parties, and anything else which will facilitate the process. (c) BDRP Conference Scheduling. Within 7 days of the telephonic conference, the Resolution Advocate shall give notice to the parties of the time and place for the BDRP conference, which conference shall commence not later than 28 days following the date of appointment of the Resolution Advocate, and which shall be held in a suitable neutral setting, such as the office of the Resolution Advocate, at a location convenient to the parties. Upon written stipulation between the Resolution Advocate and the parties, the BDRP conference may be continued for a period not to exceed 28 days.
(d) BDRP Statements. Unless modified by the Resolution Advocate, no later than 14 days after the date of the order assigning the Matter to the BDRP, each party shall submit directly to the Resolution Advocate, and shall serve on all other parties, a written BDRP statement. Such statements shall not exceed 15 pages (not counting exhibits and attachments). While such statements may include any information that would be useful, they must: (1) Identify the person(s), in addition to counsel, who will attend the session as representative of the party with decision making authority; (2) Describe briefly the substance of the dispute; (3) Address whether there are legal or factual issues whose early resolution might appreciably reduce the scope of the dispute or contribute significantly to settlement; (4) Identify the discovery that could contribute most to equipping the parties for meaningful discussions; (5) Set forth the history of past settlement discussions, including disclosure of prior and any presently outstanding offers and demands; (6) Make an estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery, pretrial motions, expert witnesses and trial; and BKR 59 (Effective May 4, 2026) (7) Indicate presently scheduled dates for further status conferences, pretrial conferences, trial or otherwise.
(e) Statements Not To Be Filed. The written BDRP statements shall not be filed with the Court and the Court shall not have access to them. (f) Identification of Participants. Parties may identify in the BDRP statements persons connected to a party opponent (including a representative of a party opponent’s insurance carrier) whose presence at the BDRP conference would improve substantially the prospects for making the session productive; the fact that a person has been so identified, shall not, by itself, result in an order compelling that person to attend the BDRP conference.
(g) Documents. Parties shall attach to their written BDRP statements copies of documents out of which the dispute has arisen, e.g., contracts, or those whose availability would materially advance the purposes of the BDRP conference.
Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this local rule, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.