Selecting an ADR Process (a) Meet and Confer to Select ADR Process. In cases assigned to the ADR Multi-Option Program, as soon as feasible after filing or removal and no later than the deadline to mee

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Rule Set: ADR Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California

Rule: 3-5

Jurisdiction: NDCA

Bluebook Citation: N.D. Cal. ADR L.R. 3-5

(b) ADR Certification. In cases assigned to the ADR Multi-Option Program, no later than the date specified in the Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines (presumptively 21 days before the date set for the initial case management conference), counsel and client must sign, serve, and file an ADR Certification. The certification must be filed on a form established for that purpose by the Court and in conformity with the instructions approved by the Court. Separate certifications may be filed by each party.

If the client is a government or government agency, the certificate shall be signed by a person who meets the requirements of Civil L.R. 3-9(c). If the date of the initial case management conference is changed, unless otherwise ordered the ADR Certification deadline adjusts accordingly. Counsel and client must certify that both have: (1) Read the handbook entitled “Alternative Dispute Resolution Procedures Handbook” on the Court’s ADR website (found at cand.uscourts.gov/adr); (2) Discussed with each other the available dispute resolution options provided by the Court and private entities; and (3) Considered whether their case might benefit from any of the available dispute resolution options. Counsel must further certify that they have discussed selection of an ADR process and an appropriate deadline for an ADR session with counsel for the other parties to the case and must indicate whether they intend to stipulate to an ADR process and deadline or prefer to discuss ADR selection with the assigned Judge at the case management conference.

USDC ADR

Local Rules – Effective May 1, 2018 ADR-7 (c) Stipulation to ADR Process. If the parties agree to participate in an ADR process and they wish the Court to make an ADR referral in advance of the case management conference, they may file a Stipulation and Proposed Order selecting an ADR process. (d) Selection at Case Management Conference. (1) Consideration of ADR Processes.

Counsel must include in their joint case management statement a report on the status of ADR, specifying which ADR process option they have selected and a proposed deadline by which the parties will conduct the ADR session or, if they do not agree, setting forth which option and timing each party prefers. Unless the assigned Judge already has approved a stipulation to an ADR process, counsel must be prepared to discuss all of the subjects about which they were required to meet and confer under ADR L.R. 3- 5(a). If the ADR legal staff holds an ADR Phone Conference in advance of the initial case management conference, they ordinarily will make a recommendation to the assigned Judge. (2) Selection by Stipulation or Order.

If the parties agree to a particular ADR process at the case management conference and the assigned Judge approves, the Judge will issue an order referring the case to that process. Alternatively, even if the parties do not agree, the Judge may issue an order referring the case to ENE, Mediation, or a Settlement Conference. (3) Deferred Referral or Exemption. If, considering the views of the parties, the Judge at the case management conference concludes that the case is not ripe for an ADR referral or that no ADR process is likely to deliver benefits to the parties sufficient to justify the resources devoted to it, the Judge may defer making an ADR referral or may exempt the case from participating in any ADR process.

Chat with this local rule using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this local rule, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.