Standing Order - Courtroom Opportunities for Relatively Inexperienced Attorneys; Civil Scheduling Order

Hon. David H. Hennessy · U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts

Role: Magistrate Judge

Bluebook Citation: Hon. David H. Hennessy, Standing Order - Courtroom Opportunities for Relatively Inexperienced Attorneys; Civil Scheduling Order, U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts

Judge Profile: Hon. David H. Hennessy profile and standing orders


Text

=== Standing Order - Courtroom Opportunities for Relatively Inexperienced Attorneys ===

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS STANDING ORDER REGARDING COURTROOM OPPORTUNITIES FOR RELATIVELY INEXPERIENCED ATTORNEYS May 6, 2019 Courtroom opportunities for relatively inexperienced attorneys, particularly those who practice at larger law firms, have declined precipitously. In 2005, Judge Saylor issued a standing order governing practice in his session which remains in effect and specifically encourages participation of relatively inexperienced attorneys in all court proceedings. Judges Casper, Hillman, Talwani, and Sorokin each have followed suit, issuing standing orders modeled on Judge Saylor’s Order. Recognizing the importance of the development of future generations of practitioners through courtroom opportunities, I now join my colleagues. I strongly encourage the participation of relatively inexperienced attorneys in all court proceedings including initial scheduling conferences, status conferences, hearings on discovery as well as dispositive motions, and examination of witnesses at evidentiary hearings and trials. In addition, I strongly encourage the participation in court of the attorney who wrote the substantial majority of the papers giving rise to the proceeding before the Court. The following cautions regarding professionalism, authority, and supervision shall apply. First, all attorneys appearing in this court, including those who are relatively inexperienced, will be held to the highest professional standards. In particular, all attorneys appearing in court, regardless of experience, are expected to be appropriately prepared. For example, any attorney who is arguing a motion is expected to be thoroughly familiar with the factual record and applicable law pertinent to that motion. Second, all attorneys appearing in court should have a degree of authority commensurate with the proceeding that they are assigned to handle. For example, an attorney appearing at a scheduling conference ordinarily should have the authority to propose and agree to a discovery schedule and any other matters reasonably likely to arise at the conference. Third, relatively inexperienced attorneys who seek to participate in evidentiary hearings of substantial complexity, such as examining a witness at trial, should be accompanied and supervised by a more experienced attorney, unless leave of Court is granted otherwise. Counsel are encouraged to seek additional guidance from the Court in particular cases concerning the scope or application of this policy. SO ORDERED. /s/ David H. Hennessy United States Magistrate Judge 2

=== Civil Scheduling Order ===

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Plaintiff, v. Defendant. HENNESSY, M.J. CIVIL ACTION NO. ___________ SCHEDULING ORDER This Scheduling Order is intended to provide a reasonable timetable for discovery and motion practice in order to help ensure a fair and just resolution of this matter without undue expense or delay. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 1. Timetable for Discovery and Motion Practice Pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 16.1(F), it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. 2. Initial Disclosures. Initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) must be completed by __________. Amendments to Pleadings. Except for good cause shown, no motions seeking leave to add new parties or to amend the pleadings to assert new claims or defenses may be filed after __________. 3. Fact Discovery - Interim Deadlines. a. b. c. All requests for production of documents and interrogatories must be served by _________. All requests for admission must be served by . All depositions, other than expert depositions, must be completed by __________. Fact Discovery - Final Deadline. All discovery, other than expert discovery, must be completed by _________. Case Management Conference. A case management conference will be held on ________. At the conference, among other things, the court will address whether 4. 5. it is appropriate to schedule a separate settlement conference, pursuant to Local Rule 16.1(F)(7). 6. Expert Discovery. a. b. c. d. Plaintiff(s)= trial experts must be designated, and the information contemplated by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) must be disclosed by _______. Plaintiff(s)= trial experts must be deposed by ________. Defendant(s)= trial experts must be designated, and the information contemplated by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) must be disclosed by _________. Defendant(s)= trial experts must be deposed by _________. 7. Dispositive Motions. a. b. Dispositive motions, such as motions for summary judgment or partial summary judgment, and motions for judgment on the pleadings, must be filed by . Oppositions to dispositive motions must be filed within 30 days after service of the motion. Initial Pretrial Conference. An initial pretrial conference will be held on _________ at a.m./p.m. The parties shall prepare and submit a pretrial memorandum in accordance with Local Rule 16.5(D) five business days before the date of the conference, except that the parties need not include matters required by Local Rule 16.5(D)(2) or (3). Procedural Provisions Extension of Deadlines. Pursuant to Local Rule 16.1(G), motions to extend or modify scheduling order deadlines will be granted only for good cause shown. All motions to extend shall contain a brief statement of the reasons for the request; a summary of the discovery, if any, that remains to be taken; and a specific date when the requesting party expects to complete the additional discovery, join other parties, amend the pleadings, or file a motion. Discovery Disputes. In the court's experience, many discovery and case management disputes can be promptly resolved in a conference with the court and counsel. The court directs counsel to avail themselves of the following alternative to Local Rule 37.1 to resolve a discovery dispute: lead counsel should confer and agree on the scope and nature of the dispute. Counsel are then directed to (1) 8. 1. 2. 2 submit a joint memorandum, no longer than two pages in length, describing the nature and scope of the dispute, i.e., the need for the discovery, the basis for the objection to producing discovery, and any recommended resolution; and, (2) contact the Deputy Clerk to request a telephone status conference. The court will set a conference to occur within 48 hours, and will endeavor to resolve the dispute during the conference. The court may, in situations involving more substantive matters, direct counsel to file the appropriate motion for relief. Notwithstanding same, and except for good cause shown, motions to compel discovery, motions for protective orders, motions to quash, motions to strike discovery responses, and similar motions must be filed no later than the close of fact discovery or the close of expert discovery, whichever deadline is relevant. If additional discovery is compelled by the court after the relevant deadline has passed, the court may enter such additional orders relating to discovery as may be appropriate. 3. 4. 5. 6. Reply Memoranda. Parties should refer to Local Rule 7.1(B)(3). Case Management Conferences. The court has scheduled a case management conference after (or close to) the close of fact discovery for case management purposes. Any party who reasonably believes that a case management conference will assist in the management or resolution of the case may request one from the court upon reasonable notice to opposing counsel. Additional Conferences. Upon request of counsel, or at the court=s own initiative, additional case management conferences may be scheduled. Parties may request telephonic conferences where appropriate to avoid undue inconvenience or expense. Early Resolution of Issues. The court recognizes that, in some cases, resolution of one or more preliminary issues may remove a significant impediment to settlement or otherwise expedite resolution of the case. Counsel are encouraged to identify any such issues and to make appropriate motions at an early stage in the litigation. 7. Pretrial Conference. Lead trial counsel must attend any pretrial conference. Date By the Court, _________________ Deputy Clerk 3

Chat with this judge practice using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this judge practice, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.