Judge van Keulen's Civil & Discovery Referral Matters Standing Order pdf, 216.71 KB; Judge van Keulen's Civil Pretrial Standing Order pdf, 1.24 MB; Judge van Keulen's Settlement Conference Standing Order pdf, 493.71 KB; Standing Order For All Judges Of The Northern District Of California pdf, 86.54

=== Judge van Keulen's Civil & Discovery Referral Matters Standing Order pdf, 216.71 KB ===

CIVIL AND DISCOVERY REFERRAL MATTERS STANDING ORDER MAGISTRATE JUDGE SUSAN VAN KEULEN Updated February 2026 1. LOCATION The parties must check ECF to confirm whether any hearing will be in-person or by Zoom video link. • All civil discovery and motion hearings will be in person unless otherwise noticed by the Court in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jose Federal Courthouse. • Initial case management conferences, status conferences, and order to show cause hearings in re settlement/dismissal will be by Zoom video link. Specific call-in/Zoom instructions will be posted on ECF no later than 48 hours in advance. General information is available in Judge van Keulen’s scheduling notes on the Court website. • Any deviation from the appearance standards above requires prior approval of the Court. The requesting party must file an administrative motion to appear by Zoom video link or telephonic link at least 5 days before the hearing. If the request is granted, specific call-in/Zoom instructions will be posted on ECF no later than 48 hours in advance. 2. SCHEDULING Civil case management conferences are held on Tuesdays at 9:30 a.m. Civil motions are heard on Tuesdays at 10:00 a.m. Civil pretrial conferences are held on Thursdays at 9:30 a.m. Parties are not required to reserve a hearing date but should confirm at cand.uscourts.gov that the Court is not unavailable on the date selected. Hearings and motions may be reset by the Court as its calendar requires. For questions regarding scheduling, please contact the Courtroom Deputy at [email protected] or (408) 535-5363. 3. COMMUNICATION WITH THE COURT Any requests for Court action must be filed on the docket. Parties must refrain from contacting the Courtroom Deputy by email or telephone unless (1) required to do so by one of the Court’s standing orders; (2) instructed to do so by the Court; or (3) necessary to inform the Court about a time-sensitive matter. Contact with the Courtroom Deputy must be limited to purely administrative matters, such as scheduling and general case management. Parties are not to communicate with the Courtroom Deputy regarding substantive or procedural issues, such as requests for legal advice or for interpretation of procedural rules. 1 4. 5. CASES INITIALLY ASSIGNED TO JUDGE VAN KEULEN: CONSENT OR DECLINATION In civil cases initially assigned to Judge van Keulen for all purposes, each party must file written consent to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge or a written request for reassignment to a district judge as soon as possible but no later than the deadlines specified in Civil Local Rule 73-1(a). If a party files a dispositive motion (such as a motion to dismiss or a motion for remand), the moving party must file the consent or declination simultaneously with the motion. CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENTS In civil cases assigned to Judge van Keulen for all purposes, all joint case management statements are due one week before the case management conference. Joint case management statements must include as the first item the case schedule, if it has been set, as well as all information required under the Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District of California – Contents of Joint Case Management Statement. 6. MOTIONS AND STIPULATIONS a. PROPOSED ORDERS AND STIPULATIONS All stipulations and proposed orders are to be emailed in Word format to [email protected] on the same day as the documents are e-filed. b. MOTIONS TO SEAL • Motions to seal shall be filed in accordance with Civil Local Rule 79-5. When submitting a proposed order pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(c)(3), the table format included in the order shall comply with the below format: Document Text to be Sealed [redacted portions to be identified by page and line number] Basis for Sealing • Where a party (“Filing Party”) files a motion to consider whether another party’s (“Designating Party”) materials should be sealed pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79- 5(f), the Designating Party’s statement and/or declaration in support of sealing pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(f)(3) shall attach as exhibit(s) the proposed, public, redacted version of the document(s) sought to be sealed to the extent the proposed redactions differ from the redactions proposed by the Filing Party. c. POST-ANSWER DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS Unless otherwise permitted by the Court, only one Motion for Summary Judgment, Partial Summary Judgment, or Summary Adjudication may be filed by each party. d. MOTIONS TO STRIKE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES Motions to strike affirmative defenses may not be filed without leave of Court. Leave of Court may be sought by a motion for administrative relief pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-11. 2 e. FORMAT OF MOTIONS: i. USE OF FOOTNOTES Use of footnotes in Court filings is to be limited to providing brief points of clarification or cross-references. Argument in footnotes will not be considered by the Court. The form of footnotes must comply with Civil Local Rule 3-4(c)(2). The Court may strike any filing that includes excessive or improper footnotes. ii. EXHIBITS The cover page of any exhibit submitted in connection with briefing on a motion must include the exhibit number and the title or brief description of the exhibit (e.g., “Ex. 1 – 1/1/2023 email from Joe Smith to Nancy Jones”). f. HEARING MATERIALS Any party who distributes materials at the hearing on any matter must supply the Court with two color copies of those materials at the hearing and all other parties with at least one copy. Unless the Court orders otherwise, all materials are to be filed on ECF promptly following the hearing. 7. DISCOVERY a. PROTECTIVE ORDERS All proposed discovery protective orders in cases in which Judge van Keulen is the assigned discovery referral judge and in cases that are assigned to Judge van Keulen for all purposes through consent of the parties shall be submitted for Judge van Keulen’s signature in text- searchable PDF format. If the submitting party or parties have used one of this District’s model protective orders as the basis for their proposed protective order, their submission of the proposed protective order must be accompanied by either: (1) a redline version indicating any changes from the model order or (2) a statement in the caption or a cover pleading that the parties have not made any changes from the model order. b. DISCOVERY DISPUTES Discovery disputes in cases in which Judge van Keulen is the assigned discovery referral judge and in cases that are assigned to Judge van Keulen for all purposes through consent of the parties shall follow the same procedures set forth below: • For all discovery disputes, the parties must meet and confer to attempt to resolve the dispute. The meet and confer must be in person or by videoconference and conducted by counsel with authority to negotiate and compromise. A mere exchange of letters, emails, telephone calls, or voicemail messages does not satisfy the requirement to meet and confer. 3 • • • If the parties are unable to reach a resolution, they must file a joint statement not to exceed 10 pages, exclusive of the caption page, double-spaced with 12-point font and in text-searchable PDF format. Footnotes, if any, must comply with section 6(e)(i) above. In the opening paragraph, the joint statement must: (1) state the dates for the close of fact discovery and, if set, start of trial; (2) briefly describe each unresolved issue without undue argument; and (3) set forth each party’s proposed compromise with respect to each unresolved issue. In addition, when specific discovery requests are disputed, the parties must include as an exhibit a joint chart, in landscape format, summarizing the basis of the dispute. Specifically, the chart must set forth in columns only the following: the disputed request, the response thereto, the parties’ respective proposed compromises and a blank column for the Court’s use. The chart must not contain argument; the Court considers only arguments set forth in the joint statement. The summary chart should present as follows: Requesting Party’s Proposed Compromise Objecting Party’s Proposed Compromise For the Court’s Use Discovery Request(s) (e.g., RFPs, Interrogatories, Etc.) Objecting Party’s Response or Objection This column should include the text of any disputed request, with no additional argumentation by a party. This column should include the text of original (and supplemental, if appropriate) response at issue. Where numerous requests are in dispute, the Parties may organize them by category, identified by sub-headings in the chart, to be resolved in a single ruling. Only if the response or objection is originally and properly made in the joint statement, a brief summary of the joint-statement response may be included. This chart is not the place to restate arguments or assert additional arguments. • The joint statement must also include each party’s proposed order as an exhibit. 4 • Absent prior leave of Court, the only additional exhibit(s) permitted to the joint statement are a copy of the specific discovery request(s) at issue and the response(s) to it (e.g., requests for production, interrogatories, privilege log, nonparty subpoena, deposition excerpts, initial disclosures, contentions, etc.) • The joint statement must be filed in ECF under the Civil Events category of Motions and Related Filings > Motions: General > Discovery Letter Brief. • Word versions of the joint chart exhibit and each party’s proposed order must also be emailed to [email protected] • Upon review of the joint statement, the Court will advise the parties regarding the need, if any, for more briefing, a hearing, or a telephonic conference. • For all cases, the joint statement must be filed no later than 7 days after the discovery cut-off date(s) pursuant to Civil Local Rule 37-3. c. PRIVILEGE LOGS If a party withholds information that is responsive to a discovery request and is otherwise discoverable under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, by claiming that it is privileged or protected from discovery under the attorney work product doctrine or any other protective doctrine (including, but not limited to, privacy rights), that party shall prepare a privilege log (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(5 setting forth the privilege relied upon and specifying separately for each document or for each category of similarly-situated documents: a. The name and job title or capacity of the author; b. The name and job title or capacity of each recipient; c. The date the document was prepared and, if different, the date(s) on which it was sent to or shared with persons other than its author(s); d. The title and description of the document; e. The subject matter addressed in the document; f. The purpose(s) for which it was prepared or communicated; and g. The specific basis for the claim that it is privileged. The privilege log will be produced as quickly as possible, but no later than 14 days after the discovery responses are due, unless the parties stipulate or the Court orders otherwise. 8. AMENDED PLEADINGS If a party filed an amended complaint or other amended pleading, they must also file as an exhibit to the pleading a redline version showing what changes have been made to the most-recent version. Self-represented parties are not required to comply with this requirement. 5 9. 10. CHAMBERS COPIES NOT REQUIRED; EXCEPTIONS Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(d)(7), no chambers copies are required unless specifically requested by the Court. If chambers copies are requested by the Court, parties are to notify the courtroom deputy at [email protected] when they have been delivered. USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) Counsel is responsible for providing complete and accurate representations in any submission (including filings, demonstratives, evidence and oral argument) to the Court as required by Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the California Rules of Professional Conduct, and any other applicable legal or ethical guidance. Use of generative AI tools, such as ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, etc., in preparing submissions to the Court is not prohibited, but counsel and self-represented parties must at all times personally confirm for themselves the accuracy of any content generated by these tools. The signature of counsel or a self-represented party on any submission containing AI- generated content, including citations generated by AI, constitutes a certification that the signing attorney (or self-represented party) has personally verified the content’s accuracy. The Court will impute any errors by such AI tools to the attorney or party whose signature appears on the document containing those errors. Failure to verify the accuracy of submissions, particularly the accuracy of citations to law and evidence, may be grounds for sanctions. Counsel is responsible for maintaining records of all prompts or inquiries submitted to any generative AI tools in the event those records become relevant at any point. SO ORDERED. February 2, 2026 SUSAN VAN KEULEN United States Magistrate Judge 6

=== Standing Order For All Judges Of The Northern District Of California pdf, 86.54 KB ===

STANDING ORDER FOR ALL JUDGES OF THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CONTENTS OF JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT All judges of the Northern District of California require identical information in Joint Case Management Statements filed pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-9. The parties must include the following information in their statement which, except in unusually complex cases, should not exceed ten pages: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. Jurisdiction and Service: The basis for the court’s subject matter jurisdiction over plaintiff’s claims and defendant’s counterclaims, whether any issues exist regarding personal jurisdiction or venue, whether any parties remain to be served, and, if any parties remain to be served, a proposed deadline for service. Facts: A brief chronology of the facts and a statement of the principal factual issues in dispute. Legal Issues: A brief statement, without extended legal argument, of the disputed points of law, including reference to specific statutes and decisions. Motions: All prior and pending motions, their current status, and any anticipated motions. Amendment of Pleadings: The extent to which parties, claims, or defenses are expected to be added or dismissed and a proposed deadline for amending the pleadings. Evidence Preservation: A brief report certifying that the parties have reviewed the Guidelines Relating to the Discovery of Electronically Stored Information (“ESI Guidelines”), and confirming that the parties have met and conferred pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) regarding reasonable and proportionate steps taken to preserve evidence relevant to the issues reasonably evident in this action. See ESI Guidelines 2.01 and 2.02, and Checklist for ESI Meet and Confer. Disclosures: Whether there has been full and timely compliance with the initial disclosure requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26, and a description of the disclosures made. Discovery: Discovery taken to date, if any, the scope of anticipated discovery, any proposed limitations or modifications of the discovery rules, a brief report on whether the parties have considered entering into a stipulated e-discovery order, a proposed discovery plan pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f), and any identified discovery disputes. Class Actions: If a class action, a proposal for how and when the class will be certified, and whether all attorneys of record for the parties have reviewed the Procedural Guidance for Class Action Settlements. Related Cases: Any related cases or proceedings pending before another judge of this court, or before another court or administrative body. Relief: All relief sought through complaint or counterclaim, including the amount of any damages sought and a description of the bases on which damages are calculated. In addition, any party from whom damages are sought must describe the bases on which it contends damages should be calculated if liability is established. Updated November 30, 2023 1 12. Settlement and ADR: Prospects for settlement, ADR efforts to date, and a specific ADR plan for the case, including compliance with ADR L.R. 3-5 and a description of key discovery or motions necessary to position the parties to negotiate a resolution. 13. Other References: Whether the case is suitable for reference to binding arbitration, a special master, or the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. 14. Narrowing of Issues: Issues that can be narrowed by agreement or by motion, suggestions to expedite the presentation of evidence at trial (e.g., through summaries or stipulated facts), and any request to bifurcate issues, claims, or defenses. The parties shall jointly identify (in bold or highlight) one to three issues which are the most consequential to the case and discuss how resolution of these issues may be expedited. 15. 16. Scheduling: Proposed dates for designation of experts, discovery cutoff, hearing of dispositive motions, pretrial conference and trial. Trial: Whether the case will be tried to a jury or to the court and the expected length of the trial. 17. Disclosure of Non-party Interested Entities or Persons: Whether each party has filed the “Certification of Interested Entities or Persons” required by Civil Local Rule 3-15. In addition, each party must restate in the case management statement the contents of its certification by identifying any persons, firms, partnerships, corporations (including parent corporations) or other entities known by the party to have either: (i) a financial interest in the subject matter in controversy or in a party to the proceeding; or (ii) any other kind of interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding. In any proposed class, collective, or representative action, the required disclosure includes any person or entity that is funding the prosecution of any claim or counterclaim. 18. Professional Conduct: Whether all attorneys of record for the parties have reviewed the Guidelines for Professional Conduct for the Northern District of California. 19. Such other matters as may facilitate the just, speedy and inexpensive disposition of this matter. Updated November 30, 2023 2