Informal Telephonic Conferences re Discovery Disputes; Standing Orders

Hon. United States Magistrate Allison Claire (AC) · U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California

Role: Magistrate Judge

Bluebook Citation: Hon. United States Magistrate Allison Claire (AC), Informal Telephonic Conferences re Discovery Disputes; Standing Orders, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California

Judge Profile: Hon. United States Magistrate Allison Claire (AC) profile and standing orders

=== Informal Telephonic Conferences re Discovery Disputes ===

U.S. Magistrate Judge Allison Claire United States District Court, Eastern District of California 501 I Street, Courtroom #26, 8th Floor Sacramento, California 95914 Informal Telephonic Conferences re Discovery Disputes Upon order of the court in an appropriate case, or by agreement of the parties, Judge Claire will resolve discovery disputes outside the formal Local Rule 251 procedures by conducting an informal telephonic conference. Parties wishing to avail themselves of this option should follow the procedure outlined below. A party with a discovery dispute shall first confer with the opposing party in a good faith effort to resolve the dispute without court action. The parties must meet and confer in person or via telephone or video conferencing. If such efforts fail, the prospective moving party may contact the courtroom deputy, Jonathan Anderson, at [email protected] or (916) 930- 4199 to request an informal telephonic conference with Judge Claire. The prospective moving party, after having conferred with the opposing party and secured agreement to pursue informal resolution, shall advise the court of the dates and times in the next 3-14 days when all concerned parties are available for a telephonic conference. The court will then issue a minute order advising counsel of the time and date of the telephonic conference. The parties shall promptly provide the courtroom deputy with landline numbers where they can be reached at the time of the telephonic conference. At least 24 hours before the telephonic conference, unless a different deadline is set in the minute order, the parties shall file a joint letter briefly explaining what meet and confer efforts they have undertaken and providing a synopsis of the discovery dispute. The joint letter brief shall be no more than 2 pages in length, including any exhibits or attachments (which are discouraged), and shall be in at least 12-point type. Pages exceeding this limit will not be considered. The letter shall be emailed to [email protected]. No paper courtesy copy is required, and the letter should not be filed on the docket. After the telephonic conference, the court may issue a minute order ruling on the issues presented. Alternatively, if it is determined that further briefing is needed to satisfactorily resolve the dispute, the court may order the parties to file formal briefing pursuant to Local Rule 251. This informal process is not a prerequisite to the filing of a motion. Rather, it is intended to offer an alternative method of discovery dispute resolution for relatively narrow disputes. Counsel should request this informal process only for disputes that in counsel’s view are amenable to resolution on the basis of a letter brief and telephonic conference, without the need for a further record. Should the court or any party conclude during the conference that a fully briefed motion is preferable, no ruling will issue and a motion may be brought subject to the operative case scheduling order. Informal telephonic conferences, as described above, will not be held on the record. However, parties are cautioned that the court will maintain the power to issue monetary and other sanctions during such conferences, including for failures to meet and confer in good faith or abuses of the discovery process. Implementation of these telephonic conferences will under no circumstances give the parties a “free pass” to gain the court’s audience on every minor discovery disagreement that may arise. If the telephonic conferences are abused, sanctions will issue.

=== Standing Orders ===

U.S. Magistrate Judge Allison Claire United States District Court, Eastern District of California 501 I Street, Courtroom No. 26, 8th Floor Sacramento, California 95914 Jonathan Anderson, Courtroom Deputy Clerk (916) 930-4199 [email protected] STANDING ORDERS: CIVIL CASES CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE MAGISTRATE JUDGE IN CIVIL CASES: In accordance with 28 U.S.C §636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73 and Local Rule 305, the United States Magistrate Judges of the Eastern District are available to exercise the court’s case dispositive jurisdiction and to conduct any or all case dispositive proceedings, including motions to dismiss, motions for summary judgment, a jury or non-jury trial, and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by a Magistrate Judge is permitted only where all parties consent, either by filing consent forms provided by the Clerk of Court or, for suits assigned directly to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to Appendix A of the Local Rules, by failing to submit the provided form declining Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. The primary benefit of consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction is that the trial calendars of magistrate judges are generally less congested and more flexible than those of district judges, because magistrate judges do not conduct felony criminal trials. http://www.caed.uscourts.gov/caednew/assets/File/Consent%20on%20web.pdf CIVIL LAW AND MOTION: Civil law and motion is heard every Wednesday at 10:00 a.m. Motion dates are not reserved. To calendar a non-discovery motion, file your papers in accordance with Local Rule 230. PAGE LIMITS: Initial moving papers in non-discovery matters, and oppositions to such motions, are limited to 20 pages. Replies are limited to 10 pages. Page limits do not include the index or table of contents, table of cases, or exhibits (if any). Documents exceeding these limits without advance leave of court, for good cause shown, will be stricken without further notice. These page limits also apply to discovery-related motions in prisoner cases only, which are exempt from the Joint Statement requirement of Local Rule 251. ORAL ARGUMENT: Motions will be heard in person in Courtroom No. 26 unless the court orders the hearing to be conducted via videoconferencing (or orders the motion submitted without hearing). When a hearing is conducted in the courtroom, telephonic appearances are permitted as specified further below. When a hearing is conducted via videoconferencing, all necessary parties must appear via the specified videoconferencing platform. Page 1 of 5 Where a party is proceeding in pro se, that party’s preference for in-person or video appearance will be given significant weight. The pro se party may contact the courtroom deputy not less than one week before the hearing to express a preference. When an in- person hearing is set in a case involving a pro se party, any other party wishing to appear telephonically must so inform the pro se party prior to making the request, and shall inform the courtroom deputy whether the request is opposed. YOUNG ATTORNEYS: The court values the importance of training young attorneys. If a written request for oral argument is filed before a hearing in a non-prisoner case, stating that an attorney four or fewer years out of law school will argue the motion, then the court will hold the hearing. Otherwise, the court may find it appropriate in some cases to submit a motion without oral argument. COURTESY COPIES – MOTION-RELATED DOCUMENTS: Except as provided below regarding Joint Statements re Discovery Disputes, and any contrary provisions of the Local Rules notwithstanding, courtesy copies of motion-related documents that are electronically filed or submitted to Judge Claire via email are unnecessary and should not be filed unless specifically requested by the court. DISCOVERY DISPUTES – HEARINGS AND JOINT STATEMENTS: Local Rule 251 (Fed. R. Civ. P. 37) requires the parties in non-prisoner cases to file a Joint Statement re Discovery Disagreement (“Joint Statement”). Judge Claire strictly enforces the deadline for filing Joint Statements. Any motion will be removed from calendar if the Joint Statement is not filed at least fourteen (14) days before the scheduled hearing date. As required by Local Rule 251(c), the Joint Statement must include in a single document all argument and briefing related to the respective positions of the parties, and must reproduce in full each discovery request objected to and each objection. Any exhibits, including declarations, should be electronically filed as attachments to the Joint Statement, not as separate docket entries. PAGE LIMITS: Absent leave of court for good cause shown, the Joint Statement is limited to 25 pages, exclusive of exhibits and tables (if any). COURTESY COPIES of all Joint Statements, with declarations, exhibits and other attachments tabbed, are mandatory and should be delivered to the Clerk of Court at least fourteen (14) days before the scheduled hearing. Judge Claire strictly enforces meet and confer requirements. Written correspondence between the parties, including email, is insufficient to satisfy the parties’ meet and confer obligations under Local Rule 251(b). Prior to the filing of a Joint Statement, the parties must confer in person or via telephone or video conferencing in an attempt to resolve the dispute. DISCOVERY DISPUTES – INFORMAL TELEPHONIC CONFERENCES: Judge Claire encourages early resolution of discovery disputes outside the formal Local Rule 251 procedures. Page 2 of 5 Upon order of the court in an appropriate case, or by agreement of the parties, Judge Claire will resolve discovery disputes by conducting an informal telephonic conference. The procedures for obtaining and participating in an informal telephonic discovery conference are set forth in Judge Claire’s Policy re Informal Telephonic Discovery Conferences. These procedures include a meet and confer requirement (see above) and require a 2-page synopsis of the dispute in lieu of a formal Joint Statement. This informal process is not a prerequisite to the filing of a motion under Local Rule 251. Rather, it is an alternative to a formal motion. Counsel should request this alternative discovery dispute resolution process only for disputes that in counsel’s view may be amenable to resolution on the basis of a letter brief and telephonic conference, without the need for a further record. http://www.caed.uscourts.gov/caednew/assets/File/Judge%20Claire%20Telephonic%20Discover SETTLEMENT CONFERENCES: As scheduled by Courtroom Deputy. a) Confidential Settlement Conference Statements are mandatory from each party and must be submitted to Judge Claire’s chambers at least seven (7) calendar days prior to the Settlement Conference. Electronic submission may be made to [email protected]. If Statements are not timely filed, the settlement conference will be vacated. b) Parties are strongly encouraged, but not required, to share all or part of their settlement conference statements with each other. c) Parties must appear with counsel. Telephonic appearances are discouraged and will be permitted only in the rarest of circumstances, upon written request and for good cause. TELEPHONIC APPEARANCES: Other than for settlement conferences, and subject to Judge Claire’s procedures for hearings in cases in which a party is unrepresented by a lawyer (see above under Civil Law and Motion, Oral Argument) telephonic appearances are generally acceptable and do not require motion or written request. Please contact the courtroom deputy at least two days prior to a hearing date to make arrangements for a telephonic appearance. STANDING ORDERS: CRIMINAL CASES CRIMINAL LAW AND MOTION: Criminal law and motion is heard every Monday at 9:00 a.m. Contact courtroom deputy Jonathan Anderson, (916) 930-4199, to confirm availability of dates. WAIVERS OF APPEARANCE BY DEFENDANTS: Judge Claire will not accept routine waivers of appearance that extend by their terms to trial, judgment and/or sentencing. Page 3 of 5 STANDING ORDERS: GENERAL PROPOSED ORDERS: As required by the Local Rules, counsel shall submit via email to [email protected], the proposed order accompanying any application, request, stipulation or motion, in Microsoft Word format. Pursuant to Local Rule 131 (c), the document must include the attorneys' electronic signature(s) (i.e. /s/ First/Last name), as well as the date the document was signed. PRONOUNS AND HONORIFICS: Litigants and lawyers may indicate their pronouns (e.g., she/her, he/him, they/their) and honorifics (e.g., Mr., Ms., Mx., Dr.) by mailing a confidential letter to Judge Claire’s chambers, filing a request on the case docket, or adding the information in the name block or signature line of the pleadings. COURTESY COPIES – EXHIBITS FOR USE AT TRIAL OR EVIDENTIARY HEARING: Courtesy copies of exhibits that a party intends to offer at trial or evidentiary hearing shall be provided pursuant to the applicable scheduling order, individually tabbed and contained in a three-ring binder. CELL PHONE USE IN THE COURTROOM: All mobile phones and other electronic devices must be silenced in the courtroom. Audio recording, photography, and video recording is prohibited in all courtrooms by General Order of the Eastern District of California. TRANSCRIPT ORDERS: If you wish to order a transcript for a hearing held before Judge Claire (or another magistrate judge in the Eastern District – Sacramento Division), you must complete the Electronic Court Reporter Transcript Order Form or the Appeal Transcript Designation and Order Form as appropriate. These forms can be found on the court’s internet home page. 1. From the Court home page, select Attorney Info. 2. Select Sacramento. 3. Scroll down and select Forms. 4. Select Civil Forms. 5. Scroll down and click on Appeal Transcript Designation and Order Form or Electronic Court Reporter Transcript Order Form Completed forms should be submitted to Jonathan Anderson, (916) 930-4072 or [email protected]. AUDIO/VISUAL EQUIPMENT: The Sacramento Clerk's Office has a variety of audio/visual equipment available to use for trial purposes. Available equipment may include: ELMOs, projectors, plasma screens, TVs and VCRs. In order to learn about the equipment provided by the court, you can access our internet home page and follow these procedures: 1. From the Court’s home page, select Attorney Info. Page 4 of 5 2. Select Sacramento. 3. Scroll down and select Electronic Courtroom. 4. Select Audio Systems or Video Systems as applicable. Attorneys should arrange, through the Courtroom Deputy, a time to meet with court Information Technology staff for training on electronic equipment. Appointments should be scheduled at least one to two weeks prior to trial. COURTROOM DEPUTY: If you have any questions or need further information, please contact Jonathan Anderson at (916) 930-4199 or [email protected]. Page 5 of 5

Chat with this judge practice using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this judge practice, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.