General Order 23-01; Status Conference Procedures; Trial Procedures Supplement to Local Rules; Chapter 13 Calendar 05/21/2026; Motion Hearing Calendar 05/21/2026; Telephonic Appearance Procedures; Appointed March 18, 2010 by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; Reappointed March

=== General Order 23-01 ===

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MAR 01 2023 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN RE: PROCEDURES FOR PHASED REOPENING DURING COVID-19 PUBLIC EMERGENCY GENERAL ORDER 23-01 Upon consideration of the continuation of the Continuity of Operations Plan (“COOP”) implemented on March 18, 2020 in response to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the subsequent resumption of normal operations ordered in United States District Court General Order 21-08, and the lifting of most restrictions by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”) and the State of California, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 1. General Order 21-05 is superseded by this General Order. 2. In-Person Court Hearings. All Courtrooms in all Divisions of the United States Bankruptcy Court are open to in-person attendance, and, effective June 28, 2021, permission to appear in person or by video or telephone is in the discretion of the presiding judge in that courtroom. Any judge may choose to continue to conduct matters remotely through video or telephonic means. Please check the Court’s website for the procedures for each judge at https://www.cacb.uscourts.gov/judges/self-calendaring. -1- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3. Safety Measures in Court. Where an in-person matter is held in a courtroom, all participants are to observe all safety protocols posted and announced in the courtroom. The presiding judge will determine the protocols in effect in the assigned courtroom consistent with guidance from the CDC. 4. Intake Areas. All Intake Areas of the Court will continue to be open to accept in-person filings. a. Safety. Anyone in the Intake Area must observe all posted rules or be required to leave the Intake Area without further assistance. b. Public Computers and Electronic Kiosks. At the discretion of the Clerk of Court, public computers and electronic kiosks may be disabled and re-installed as conditions permit. c. Cash Payments. Cash will not be accepted for filing or copying fees unless an exception is made by the Clerk of Court. 5. Face Coverings. In all public areas, anyone not following posted rules may be refused service. 6. Self-Represented Filings. Individuals filing Chapter 7 or 13 bankruptcy without an attorney may file in person, by mail, or through the Court’s Electronic Self-Representation module. The rules for such filings are posted on the Court’s website at https://www.cacb.uscourts.gov/esr. Parties requiring further assistance may contact the Court at (855) 460-9641. 7. F.R.B.P. 5001(a). The electronic, mail, telephonic, and appointment access provided through the above procedures and those detailed on the Court’s website are deemed sufficient to meet the requirements of F.R.B.P. 5001(a). 8. Mediations. Mediations will continue and are in the discretion of the mediator in consultation with the parties as to whether to proceed in-person or remotely. 9. Judges’ or Courtesy Copies. Except for documents over 25 pages, including exhibits, the requirement to deliver judges’ copies of documents to chambers (LBR 5005-2(d continues to be temporarily suspended – including delivery -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 via U.S. mail, personal delivery, or any other means. Documents over 25 pages should still be provided unless the judge’s specific updated instructions have waived that requirement. Instructions for each judge can be found under the judge’s name at https://www.cacb.uscourts.gov/judges/judge- directory. Parties are reminded that the judge and chambers staff do not receive electronic notices of filings, and therefore, (a) for documents that are filed late, and (b) for matters that are either (i) not set for hearing, or (ii) not the subject of an electronically uploaded order (LOU), parties must contact the chambers of the presiding judge and advise chambers of the filing. 10. Signatures. Local Bankruptcy Rule 9011-1 is no longer suspended, effective June 28, 2021. 11. Phased Reopening Plans. A modified version of the Court’s COOP will remain in place and be further modified as necessary. Details will be posted on the Court’s website and communicated to staff as they are implemented. 12. Individual Courthouses May Be Closed. Should local suspected or confirmed cases of COVID-19 or local, state and federal guidance change, individual Court Divisions or Courtrooms may be closed without further order in the discretion of the Chief Bankruptcy Judge after appropriate consultation. Signs will be posted on the doors of the Division(s) affected and directions will be provided for obtaining needed court services. No further orders will be issued for such temporary closures. IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 DATED: March 1, 2023 25 26 27 28 Theodor C. Albert Chief Judge, United States Bankruptcy Court -3-

=== Status Conference Procedures ===

ADVERSARY PROCEEDING STATUS CONFERENCE PROCEDURES JUDGE DEBORAH J. SALTZMAN 1. The court will set an initial status conference in all adversary proceedings to be held approximately 60 days after the matter is filed. Counsel appearing at the initial status conference must be trial counsel. Unless otherwise ordered by the court, parties and counsel may attend subsequent status conferences by remote appearance in accordance with Judge Saltzman’s procedures for remote appearances, which are available on the court’s website, www.cacb.uscourts.gov, by clicking on “Judges,” and then the judge’s name. 2. A thorough status report must be filed 14 days before each status conference. The status report must be prepared on the Local Rule Form F 7016- 1.STATUS.REPORT. This form is available on the court’s website, and the plaintiff must attach a copy of the form to this document as Exhibit A. Failure to file a joint status report may result in the imposition of monetary sanctions and/or the status conference being continued, and parties being ordered to redo the status report. 3. If a party does not cooperate in preparation of a joint status report, the other party should follow the procedure set forth in LBR 7016-1(a)(3) for filing a unilateral status report. 4. circumstances: A status report is not required only in the following limited Prior to the date scheduled for the status conference, the parties A. have filed, and the court has entered an order approving, a stipulation that resolves all issues raised by the adversary proceeding and provides either for dismissal of the action in its entirety or entry of judgment in the action. Defaults have been entered as to all defendants, and the plaintiff B. has filed and served a motion for default judgment prior to the date scheduled for the status conference. C. Prior to the date scheduled for the status conference. the parties have filed, and, the court has entered an order approving, a stipulation continuing the status conference to a later date (in which case a written status report must be filed not less than 14 days in advance of the continued status conference date). The court has expressly relieved the parties of the obligation to file D. a written status report. 5. Unless one of the four exceptions outlined above applies, status reports must be filed in a timely manner. Parties that fail to do so will be subject Revised 2/23/24 to a minimum sanction of $150, or such other sanctions as may be warranted under the circumstances or allowed under Local Bankruptcy Rule 7016-1(f). 6. Failure to appear for a status conference may result in a minimum sanction of $300, dismissal of the adversary proceeding for failure to prosecute or such other sanctions as may be warranted under the circumstances or allowed under Local Bankruptcy Rule 7016-1(f). 7. If a response to the complaint is not timely filed: A. The plaintiff should file a request for entry of default by the clerk. The plaintiff also may request entry of a default judgment by filing and serving (if necessary) an appropriate motion; see Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7055 and Local Bankruptcy Rule 7055-1; AND B. No later than ten days prior to the status conference, each appearing party must file a Unilateral Status Report (containing the information set forth in Sections A-E of Local Rule Form F 7016- 1.STATUS.REPORT) as required by Local Bankruptcy Rule 7016-1(a)(3). 8. Unless otherwise ordered by the court, within seven days after the status conference, the plaintiff must submit a scheduling order that complies with Local Bankruptcy Rule 7016-1(a)(4). 9. Stipulations for extensions of time are ineffective unless approved by the court. The court is likely to deny requests to extend a response deadline to a date within five days of the hearing date unless the hearing date is continued to a date which permits the court adequate time to consider the papers. 10. A copy of these instructions—including Exhibit A, Local Rule Form F 7016-1.STATUS.REPORT—must be attached to every copy of the complaint served upon a party, and the affidavit of service must state that these instructions were served along with a copy of the summons and complaint. Revised 2/23/24 EXHIBIT A (The plaintiff shall attach a copy of Local Rule Form F 7016-1.STATUS.REPORT here) Revised 2/23/24

=== Trial Procedures Supplement to Local Rules ===

TRIAL PROCEDURES SUPPLEMENT TO LOCAL RULES JUDGE DEBORAH J. SALTZMAN I. TRIAL BRIEFS Unless otherwise ordered by the court, trial briefs are required. Trial briefs must be filed at least fourteen (14) calendar days before trial. Judge’s copies of the trial briefs should be delivered to Judge Saltzman’s chambers on the same date. The trial brief should contain (1) a concise statement of the facts of the case; (2) a short statement of any relevant procedural history; (3) a summary of the points of law involved with supporting authorities; (4) a summary of the disputed issues of fact and the testimony that such party plans to introduce in an effort to prove its version of the disputed facts, and (5) a brief discussion of any anticipated evidentiary issues or other problems that the party believes are likely to arise at trial. Unless specifically requested by the court, no additional trial briefs will be considered. II. PRE-TRIAL ORDER Unless otherwise ordered by the court, the parties must prepare and file a written joint pre-trial order pursuant to Local Bankruptcy Rule (“LBR”) 7016-1(b) through (f) not later than fourteen (14) calendar days before the pretrial conference set by the court. A judge’s copy should be delivered to chambers the same day. The pre-trial order must contain the statements and information required by LBR 7016-1(b)(2). In conjunction with the pre-trial order, the parties must meet and confer to attempt to stipulate to the authenticity and possible admissibility (without the necessity for live testimony) of the documents that have been exchanged. The court expects the parties to make good faith efforts to resolve all evidentiary issues. III. PRESENTATION OF DIRECT TESTIMONY BY DECLARATION The purpose of this procedure is to facilitate pretrial preparation and to streamline the adducement of direct testimony in trial so as to reduce trial time without sacrificing due process and a fair trial. A. Except as provided herein, each party must present the direct testimony of all of its witnesses, including expert witnesses, through the declarations of said witnesses, under penalty of perjury, otherwise admissible under the Federal Rules of Evidence. See, e.g., Lee-Benner v. Gergely (In re Gergely), 110 F.3d 1448, 1452 (9 Cir. 1997); Adair v. Sunwest Bank (In re Adair), 965 F.2d 777, 779-80 (9 direct testimony that the witness would give as though questions were propounded in the usual fashion. Each statement of fact or opinion must be separately, sequentially numbered and must contain only matters that are admissible under the Federal Rules of Evidence (e.g., avoiding redundancies, hearsay, and other objectionable statements). Cir. 1992). Each declaration must set forth the th th Page 1 of 4 Effective 8/27/14 B. All cross-examination, rebuttal, surrebuttal and appropriate impeachment evidence must be given by live testimony. The only oral testimony that may be offered at trial by a party through its own witnesses will be STRICTLY limited to rebuttal testimony or such additional testimony on matters relevant to the outcome of the proceeding as may be specifically requested by the court at the time of trial. C. If a witness refers in the declaration to an exhibit to be admitted into evidence, the exhibit must be identified in the declaration by exhibit number or letter. The exhibit itself need not be attached to the witness’s declaration, but must be included in the exhibit binder or notebook and properly marked for identification. Unless the parties stipulate to the admittance of an exhibit, the foundation for admittance of exhibits (other than for impeachment or rebuttal purposes) must be established in the declaration. Exhibits referenced in any declaration should be offered into evidence when the declaration is offered into evidence. D. If a party is unable to obtain a declaration of a witness (such as, for example, in the case of a hostile witness), counsel for that party must file (by the applicable deadline for the filing of the witness’ declaration) a declaration stating the name of the witness and a detailed summary of the expected testimony and why counsel was unable to obtain the witness’ declaration. Failure to make every reasonable effort to obtain the declaration of any witness will result in the exclusion of any oral testimony of such witness by the party attempting to offer such testimony. E. A party may present the direct testimony of a witness in the form of a transcript of a deposition of the witness, in which event the party must submit a declaration authenticating the excerpts from the transcript that contain the testimony that the party wishes to introduce (only the portions of the transcript that the party wishes to introduce should be attached to the declaration). F. The declaration of a witness for a party will be admissible at trial, subject to timely objections, only if the declarant is present at trial and subject to cross-examination. IV. EXHIBITS A. Three binders or notebooks containing all exhibits must be submitted not later than seven (7) business days prior to the commencement of the trial. All exhibits must be marked for identification prior to the commencement of the trial. Each exhibit must be marked for identification at the bottom (right) of the first page of the exhibit. Unless the parties agree upon a unified, joint set of exhibits, the plaintiff’s exhibits must be marked in numerical order, and the defendant’s exhibits must be marked in alphabetical order (e.g., Plaintiff’s Exhibit 1, etc., Defendant’s Exhibit A, etc.). If the parties agree on a unified, joint set of exhibits, the exhibits must be marked in numerical order. B. All exhibits must be assembled in a binder or notebook. Each such binder or notebook must include as its first page an exhibit register. A sample exhibit register may be obtained from the court recorder or from the clerk’s office and must be procured sufficiently in advance of the trial date to permit the completed register to be available at the commencement of trial. C. At the commencement of trial, the parties must be prepared to stipulate into evidence all exhibits that are admissible for at least one purpose. Bona-fide objections may be reserved, with the issue of admissibility deferred, until the exhibit is offered into evidence. Page 2 of 4 Effective 8/27/14 V. DEADLINES FOR SUBMISSION OF DECLARATION, EXHIBITS AND OBJECTIONS A. Plaintiff must submit to opposing counsel all declarations and exhibits comprising the plaintiff’s case in chief not later than thirty (30) days before the trial date. B. Defendant must submit to opposing counsel all declarations and exhibits comprising the defendant’s case, together with any written objections to the admission of any of Plaintiff’s exhibits or to the testimony contained in any of Plaintiff’s witness declarations, not later than twenty-one (21) days before the trial date. C. Plaintiff must submit to opposing counsel any written objections to the admission of any of Defendant’s exhibits or to the testimony contained in any of Defendant’s witness declarations not later than fourteen (14) days before the trial date. D. All witness declarations and exhibits, together with any written objections to the admission of any of the exhibits or to any of the declarations or any portion thereof, must be lodged with the Courtroom Deputy at least seven (7) days before the trial date. Each party must lodge sufficient copies of its exhibit binder, containing the exhibit register and all exhibits, for all parties, the witness stand, the court recorder, and the judge. E. At trial, each party must also have copies of any exhibits used for impeachment or rebuttal for the opposing party, witnesses and the court. F. Evidentiary objections will be adjudicated at the time a witness declaration or exhibit is offered into evidence. Any evidentiary objections to testimony contained in a written declaration that is not raised in a written objection filed within the applicable time limit set forth above shall be deemed waived. G. NO OTHER DECLARATIONS WILL BE ALLOWED. The only additional evidence that a party may offer at trial is true rebuttal evidence. If the court concludes that testimony that a party seeks to offer should more accurately be characterized as direct testimony that as rebuttal evidence, that testimony will be excluded or, if already provided, such testimony will be stricken, if it was not set forth in a timely-filed declaration submitted by such party. VI. EXCERPTS FROM DISCOVERY DOCUMENTS A. Deposition Transcripts. Each party intending to offer any evidence by way of deposition testimony pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 32, other than for impeachment or rebuttal, must lodge with the clerk the original deposition transcript, together with a copy of the transcript or pages from the transcript to be offered, marked to reflect the portions to be offered, pursuant to LBR 7030-1(b) not later than the applicable deadline for submission of declarations, exhibits and objections set forth in Section V. Transcripts may be bound on the left side and do not have to be hole-punched or blue-backed. B. Other Discovery Documents. Excerpts from interrogatories, requests for admissions, or other discovery documents to be offered at trial, other than those to be used for impeachment or rebuttal, must be filed pursuant to LBR 7026-2(c) not later than the applicable deadline for submission of declarations, exhibits and objections set forth in Section V. Page 3 of 4 Effective 8/27/14 VII. CONTINUANCE/POSTPONEMENT OF TRIAL DATE Trials will be commenced promptly at the scheduled date and time. Trial dates are not continued or vacated absent good cause, on noticed motion, supported by competent evidence. The parties will be contacted by either of Judge Saltzman’s law clerks as to whether the continuance has been granted or denied. Parties are further advised that during the week prior to trial, the court may move the starting time or day. The Courtroom Deputy will advise the parties of any such change by telephone. All parties are cautioned to adjust their schedules accordingly. The court expects counsel and witnesses to be available on 2-3 hours telephone notice for the remainder of the week. VIII. SETTLEMENT/COMPLIANCE Not later than five (5) calendar days before the trial date, counsel for Plaintiff must telephone the Courtroom Deputy at (213-894-0995) to report (a) whether the parties intend to go forward with trial as scheduled; (b) if settlement is likely; (c) whether the time reserved for trial is realistic; and (d) any other relevant information. Stipulations for settlement must be in writing, executed by each party or their counsel, and delivered to chambers before the date of trial. If time constraints prevent reducing a settlement to writing prior to trial, all the parties, or their counsel, must (a) advise chambers of the settlement and (b) appear at the time set for trial to recite the stipulation on the record. Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions, including but not limited to, removal from the trial calendar or the exclusion of evidence (i.e., witnesses who were not timely identified or exhibits which were not timely submitted). Page 4 of 4 Effective 8/27/14

=== Chapter 13 Calendar 05/21/2026 ===

BANKRUPTCY JUDGE DEBORAH J. SALTZMAN Confirmation Hearing Calendar May 21, 2026 1:30 pm 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 25-21111-DS Serjik Aghajanian Atty: LAW OFFICES OF SHIRLEE L. BLISS 26-11862-DS Daniel Alcauter Plaza Marilyn Garcia Atty: WADHWANI & SHANFELD, APLC 26-11984-DS Alain Arboleda Atty: LAW OFFICES OF JAIME A. CUEVAS, JR. 26-11334-DS Jesus Adonay Artiga Atty: LAW OFFICES OF JAIME A. CUEVAS, JR. 26-11386-DS Andrew Lee Black, Jr. Atty: TANG & ASSOCIATES 26-11494-DS Troi Branch Atty: IN PRO PER 26-11864-DS Andrew Rodriguez Buena Atty: BROTHERS LAW GROUP, LLP 25-21623-DS Carmen Elena Canjura-Gomez Atty: LAW OFFICES OF JUANITA V. MILLER 26-11570-DS Melissa Cardenas Atty: BOROWITZ & CLARK, LLP 26-11221-DS Miguel Castro Tracy Castro Atty: LAW OFFICES OF JAIME A. CUEVAS, JR. 26-10043-DS Luther Ernest Claborn Atty: IN PRO PER 26-12702-DS Arlene L Danganan Atty: STERNBERG LAW GROUP 26-10930-DS Bridget Vanarie Ebanks Tatum Atty: LAW OFFICE OF CHRIS T. NGUYEN, APC 26-12830-DS Soraya Marie Espinoza Atty: WADHWANI & SHANFELD, APLC 26-11970-DS Benjamin Albert Felix Atty: CERO BALANCE, INC. 24-18720-DS Alex Foxman Michal J Morey 26-11694-DS Edgardo Wilfredo Galdamez Atty: HAVKIN & SHRAGO Atty: NADER & BERNEMAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW 25-14061-DS Ayushka Singh Gharib Atty: LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL JAY BERGER 25-20204-DS Mardoqueo Antonio Gomez Figueroa Atty: LAW OFFICES OF JOVI USUDE 25-16966-DS Ralph Gonzalez Atty: LAW OFFICES OF JAIME A. CUEVAS, JR. 26-12575-DS Caroline Gutierrez Atty: WESTGATE LAW 26-12013-DS Rolando Guzman Atty: LAW OFFICES OF JAIME A. CUEVAS, JR. 26-10494-DS Lavonnda Renay Hemphill Atty: LAKE FOREST BANKRUPTCY 26-10994-DS Pablo David Hernandez Marroquin Atty: URE LAW FIRM 26-11960-DS Brandon Son Ho Atty: LAW OFFICE OF PETER M. LIVELY 25-19305-DS Eric Hodder Atty: LAW OFFICE OF STANLEY BOWMAN 26-10231-DS Candace Yvette Kelly Atty: OAKTREE LAW 26-10285-DS Michael Nicholy LaGuerre Atty: LAW OFFICE OF DANIELA P. ROMERO Date: 5/7/2026 Time: 4:43:42PM Page 1 of 2 BANKRUPTCY JUDGE DEBORAH J. SALTZMAN Confirmation Hearing Calendar May 21, 2026 1:30 pm 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 26-12607-DS Yunxia Li Atty: ANYAMA LAW FIRM 26-10158-DS Richard Hill Lindsay Atty: OAKTREE LAW 26-11399-DS Jose Lopez Atty: ANYAMA LAW FIRM 26-11704-DS William Hobart Love Sarah Beth Mchargue Love Atty: LAW OFFICES OF PAUL Y. LEE 26-11872-DS Fred Kenneth MacDonald Atty: BOROWITZ & CLARK, LLP 26-12274-DS Mary Markidis Atty: LOZANO LAW CENTER, INC 26-11649-DS Lujuana Sementha Medina Atty: WADHWANI & SHANFELD, APLC 26-12249-DS Elya Mirzoyan Atty: LAW OFFICES OF ARIS ARTOUNIANS 26-11447-DS Comfort Adedoyin Olude Atty: CROWDER LAW CENTER, PC 25-20571-DS Derrell Presley Selena Brown Presley Atty: BERELIANI LAW FIRM, PC 26-12550-DS Carlton A Ramey Atty: AXEL H RICHTER 26-11433-DS Guillermo Ramirez Atty: LAUREN ROSS, ESQ 26-12922-DS 26-11469-DS 26-11436-DS Michael Wayne Randle Cynthia Augustus-Randle John Gilbert Ray Martha Marie Ray Benjamin Rodriguez Rossiris Marlyn Rodriguez Atty: OAKTREE LAW Atty: LAW OFFICES OF KRYSTINA T. TRAN Atty: WADHWANI & SHANFELD, APLC 26-10739-DS Jose Hugo Sanchez Balderas Atty: LAW OFFICE OF TYSON TAKEUCHI 26-11734-DS Ermien Sulistyowati Atty: RESOLVE LAW GROUP 26-12815-DS Jermayne Darrell Thompson, Jr Atty: IN PRO PER 26-11851-DS Harry Lee True, Jr. Janice Kathleen True Atty: BOROWITZ & CLARK, LLP 26-10703-DS Julie Tsai Atty: SHIODA, LANGLEY & CHANG, LLP 26-12175-DS Irma Vargas Atty: STERNBERG LAW GROUP 26-10008-DS Felipe De Jesus Velarde Ochoa Atty: LAW OFFICES OF JUANITA V. MILLER 26-10157-DS Alex Venegas Atty: RAYMOND PEREZ, ESQ 26-12594-DS Shawntee Nichole Ware Atty: LAW OFFICES OF DAVID P. FARRELL 26-10794-DS Jeffrey Phillip Weinstein Atty: RESOLVE LAW GROUP Date: 5/7/2026 Time: 4:43:42PM Page 2 of 2

=== Motion Hearing Calendar 05/21/2026 ===

BANKRUPTCY JUDGE DEBORAH J. SALTZMAN Motion Hearing Calendar May 21, 2026 2:00 pm CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE KATHY A. DOCKERY 54 55 57 58 24-15494-DS Stephen O'Neal Alvarado TMD - DELINQUENCY 21-18714-DS Kimlashana Latice Apolonio 56 24-18526-DS DANIEL DAVID AUNER HILDA AUNER TMD - DELINQUENCY TMD - DELINQUENCY 22-15757-DS Renee C Barker TMD - DELINQUENCY 23-15733-DS 59 23-15733-DS Eva Marie Basler Demirjian Eva Marie Basler Demirjian TMD - INFEASIBILITY TMD - DELINQUENCY 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 17-21408-DS Jessie Mae Byrd TMD - EXPIRATION 21-10863-DS Celso Cano Donis TMD - EXPIRATION 23-10456-DS Angel Armenta Castro TMD - INFEASIBILITY 23-16831-DS Rilene Janice Chappelle TMD - DELINQUENCY 23-10836-DS Raymond De Jesus Del Rosario TMD - DELINQUENCY 25-17686-DS Mohamed Diakite TMD - DELINQUENCY 23-11226-DS Shushana Yasmin Djavaheri TMD - DELINQUENCY 67 23-16741-DS Marcial Aparicio Gacasan Fe Francisco Gacasan TMD - DELINQUENCY 68 19-24736-DS Rosaen De La Cruz Gamboa Vicher Alcaraz Leyva TMR - EXPIRATION 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 25-16504-DS Vivian Marie Garcia TMD - DELINQUENCY 22-13654-DS Francisco David Gomez TMD - MATERIAL DEFAULT - TAX 23-11684-DS Alfredo Arnulfo Gonzalez Candelaria Isabel Gonzalez TMD - DELINQUENCY 24-14456-DS Maria Theresa Gutierrez TMD - DELINQUENCY 23-15073-DS Mark Edward Hagen TMD - DELINQUENCY 22-15987-DS Firouzeh Harounian TMD - DELINQUENCY 23-15674-DS Nicole D Harris TMD - DELINQUENCY 25-10944-DS Miguel Herwing TMD - DELINQUENCY 25-11555-DS La Shawn M Jeanmarie TMD - DELINQUENCY Docket 58 Docket 147 Docket 43 Docket 72 Docket 51 Docket 56 Docket 142 Docket 66 Docket 83 Docket 113 Docket 70 Docket 36 Docket 109 Docket 35 Docket 113 Docket 43 Docket 38 Docket 74 Docket 64 Docket 41 Docket 73 Docket 89 Docket 40 Docket 36 Date: 5/7/2026 Time: 4:43:47PM Page 1 of 2 BANKRUPTCY JUDGE DEBORAH J. SALTZMAN Motion Hearing Calendar May 21, 2026 2:00 pm CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE KATHY A. DOCKERY 19-20743-DS Noel R. Jimenez TMD - DELINQUENCY 23-11369-DS Tiffany Larry TMD - MATERIAL DEFAULT - TAX 24-17226-DS Gerardo Lucero TMD - DELINQUENCY 24-19028-DS Sean Joseph Maicher TMD - DELINQUENCY Docket 73 Docket 83 Docket 37 Docket 41 22-14219-DS Karine Manoukian TMD - MATERIAL DEFAULT - TAX Docket 106 24-11015-DS Gayle Lynn Martinez TMD - DELINQUENCY 23-12232-DS David T Moore TMD - INFEASIBILITY 20-18437-DS Frank T Muslar TMD - INFEASIBILITY 25-19763-DS Rodelia Langit Nuqui TMD - DELINQUENCY 19-18744-DS Dora Maria Obeso TMD - DELINQUENCY 25-14828-DS Juan Mcgary Pickens, Jr. TMD - DELINQUENCY 24-18141-DS Pilar Chakarrah Pitts TMD - DELINQUENCY 23-14264-DS Marc J Prideaux TMD - DELINQUENCY 23-14264-DS Marc J Prideaux TMD - INFEASIBILITY 23-11157-DS Ernesto Quijada TMD - DELINQUENCY 22-11253-DS Lilliana Rodriguez TMD - MATERIAL DEFAULT - TAX 23-12985-DS Sandra Veronica Saget TMD - INFEASIBILITY 23-12679-DS Daniel Joseph Silva TMD - DELINQUENCY 24-12950-DS Radmila Solaja TMR - DELINQUENCY 22-12510-DS Freda Renee Stevenson TMD - DELINQUENCY 23-17730-DS Hayk Sukazi 23-18530-DS Vannak Tan Manika Nou TMD - DELINQUENCY TMD - DELINQUENCY 100 23-15002-DS Darrin Wesley TMD - INFEASIBILITY Docket 64 Docket 49 Docket 77 Docket 27 Docket 125 Docket 53 Docket 87 Docket 32 Docket 46 Docket 103 Docket 38 Docket 54 Docket 88 Docket 59 Docket 86 Docket 86 Docket 109 Docket 75 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 Date: 5/7/2026 Time: 4:43:47PM Page 2 of 2

=== Telephonic Appearance Procedures ===

Judge Deborah J. Saltzman’s Procedures for Remote Appearances Hearings before Judge Saltzman may be made in person or by remote or phone connection through ZoomGov. ALL ATTORNEYS AND PARTIES MUST REGISTER APPEARANCES NO LATER THAN 12:00 NOON THE DAY BEFORE THE HEARING BY EMAIL AS FOLLOWS: [email protected] To: Subject: Registration – [Zoom or Phone or In Person] Body: Hearing date and time Calendar number on which you are appearing Debtor name and case number Adversary proceeding name and number (if applicable) Name of the party/client appearing Attorney’s full name and SBN Phone number (if participating by phone, the number from which you will call) If any client or non-attorney representative will be observing, that person’s full name, role, and phone number IF YOU DO NOT REGISTER, YOU WILL NOT BE PERMITTED TO ATTEND THE HEARING Registered parties in interest may connect to the ZoomGov video and audio feeds, free of charge. Participation by ZoomGov video and audio may be via personal computer (equipped with camera, microphone and speaker), a handheld mobile device (such as a tablet, iPhone, or Android phone), or by audio only using a telephone (standard telephone charges may apply). Registered observers and members of the public may connect remotely by telephone to the audio feed only (standard telephone charges may apply). Neither a Zoom nor a ZoomGov account is necessary to participate. The audio portion of each hearing will be recorded electronically by the court and constitutes its official record. ZoomGov video and audio connection information for each hearing will be provided on Judge Saltzman's publicly posted hearing calendar, which may be viewed online at: http://ecf- ciao.cacb.uscourts.gov/CiaoPosted/?jid=DS Tips for a More Successful ZoomGov Court Experience 1. Test the video and audio capabilities of your computer or mobile device in advance of the hearing (i.e., at least one day in advance). • Click on the ZoomGov meeting link posting for the hearing and/or check your video and audio using the ZoomGov app. 2. If you intend to speak at the hearing, please find a quiet place from which to participate. 3. If you are connecting to the hearing using a wireless device, situate yourself in a location with a strong wireless signal. 4. Unless and until it is your turn to speak, please mute your audio to minimize background noise. • If connected to ZoomGov audio by telephone, you can mute or unmute your connection by pressing *6 on your phone. 5. When you first speak—and each time you speak after someone else has spoken— please say your name. This may seem awkward but is essential to making a good court record. The only part of the hearing being recorded is the audio. If a transcript is requested, it is sometimes difficult for the transcriber to know who is speaking. 6. If you are participating by video, try to avoid having a window or bright background behind you (a bright background can make you appear on video as a silhouette or shadow). If you cannot avoid the bright background, try using a desk lamp or other light source to brighten your face. 7. If you are participating by video using a personal computer, you may separately connect to the audio feed by telephone (for improved audio) using the call-in information provided for the hearing. • If you do this, please connect to the video feed first. In the ZoomGov app, you will be assigned a Participant Code. Use this code to associate your video and audio feeds. 8. If available, a headset-microphone often provides better sound quality for listening and speaking. 9. Participants and members of the public should at all times remember that although conducted remotely, these hearings are official court proceedings, and individuals should act accordingly. • If video is enabled, please wear suitable attire. A suit isn’t necessary, but “business casual” would be appropriate. • ZoomGov permits the use of virtual backgrounds to safeguard your privacy. If you choose to use a virtual background, please avoid backgrounds that are offensive or distracting. 10. ZoomGov video participants are permitted to specify a display name. If using video, please specify your complete name to assist the court in creating a record of the proceedings.

=== Appointed March 18, 2010 by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ===

N E W S R E L E A S E September 29, 2009 Contact: Katherine Monterola, (415) 355-8800 Court of Appeals Appoints New Bankruptcy Judges for Central, Eastern Districts of California SAN FRANCISCO — Chief Judge Alex Kozinski of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has announced the appointments of Los Angeles attorneys Catherine Bauer and Deborah J. Saltzman to serve as judges of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California, and Sacramento attorney Ronald H. Sargis to serve as a judge of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of California. Ms. Bauer will fill a judgeship vacant in Riverside since April 2008, when Bankruptcy Judge Mitchell Goldberg retired. Ms. Saltzman will also fill a judgeship left vacant in Riverside by the retirement of Bankruptcy Judge David Naugle in September 2008. Mr. Sargis will fill a vacant judgeship in Modesto resulting from reassignments of the bankruptcy court bench. All appointments are contingent upon approval of background clearances. Ms. Bauer, 49, is a lawyer in the Office of the U.S. Attorney for the Central District of California. As an assistant U.S. attorney, she represents the federal government in all civil, non-tax bankruptcy matters in consumer and commercial cases in every chapter of bankruptcy in the Central District. Ms. Saltzman, 39, has practiced bankruptcy law for the last 10 years in the Los Angeles area. She is currently an associate with the law firm of DLA Piper in Los Angeles. She also has practiced at Hennigan Bennett & Dorman, LLP, from 2006 to 2008; at O’Melveny & Myers, LLP, from 2001 to 2005 and from 1996 to 2000; and Klee, Tuchin, Bogdanoff & Stern, LLP, from 2000 to 2001. Mr. Sargis, 52, has practiced with Hefner, Stark & Marois, LLP, since 1983. He became partner in 1989 and was the managing partner from 1997 to 1998. His practice includes representation of business and individual clients in Chapter 11 and 12 reorganizations, individual debtors in Chapter 13 and 7 cases, creditors, Chapter 11 trustees, and creditors’ committees. A native of San Antonio, Texas, Ms. Bauer received her B.A. in political science from the University of California at Los Angeles in 1982. She received her J.D. in 1985 from the University of Southern California, Gould School of Law, where she was on Moot Court and received an American Judicature Award. – more – Ms. Bauer has served on the Central District’s bankruptcy mediation panel since 1995. She is an active member of the International Women’s Insolvency and Restructuring Confederation, California State Bar, Los Angeles County Bar, American Bar Association, National Civil Trial Competition, Federal Executive Board, and Girl Scouts of Greater Los Angeles (formerly Angeles Girl Scout Council). A native of New York City, Ms. Saltzman received her B.A. in history from Amherst College in 1991 (Phi Beta Kappa, 1990), and her J.D. from the University of Virginia School of Law in 1996. While in law school, she was a semifinalist in the William Minor Lile Moot Court Competition and a winner of the Bracewell & Patterson First Year Oral Argument Award. Actively involved in her community, Ms. Saltzman has taught a continuing education program on bankruptcy and restructuring. She is a mentor to young people involved in the local chapter of the Young Storytellers Foundation. She was voted by attorney peers as a Southern California Rising Star for five consecutive years, 2004-2008. A native of Merced, California, Mr. Sargis received his B.A. in political science in 1979 from Stanford University and his J.D., with distinction, in 1982 from University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law. Mr. Sargis was admitted to the California bar in 1982. He has continuously served as the general counsel to the California Association of Collectors, Inc, since 1985. He is a member and for two terms served as a board member of the Sacramento Valley Bankruptcy Forum. Mr. Sargis serves as chancellor to his church and as church attorney to the Episcopal Diocese of Northern California. The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California serves seven Southern California counties. The court is authorized 24 judges, which includes three authorized temporary judgeships, and received 65,856 bankruptcy filings in 2008. The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of California is authorized seven judges, including one temporary judgeship. In 2008, the court received 32,154 bankruptcy filings. Judges of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit have statutory responsibility for selecting and appointing bankruptcy judges in the nine western states that comprise the Ninth Circuit. The court uses a comprehensive merit selection process for the initial appointment and for reappointments. Bankruptcy judges serve a 14-year, renewable term, at a salary of $160,080, and handle all bankruptcy-related matters under the Bankruptcy Code. # # #

=== Reappointed March 18, 2024, by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ===

N E W S R E L E A S E March 11, 2024 Contact: Katherine Rodriguez [email protected] Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Reappoints Bankruptcy Judge Deborah J. Saltzman to Central District of California SAN FRANCISCO — Judges of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit have reappointed U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Deborah J. Saltzman, of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California, to a second 14-year term effective March 18. Judge Saltzman maintains chambers in Los Angeles and was appointed to the Central District bankruptcy bench in 2010. She has served in the Central District’s Riverside, Los Angeles, San Fernando Valley and Northern divisions. Before her appointment, Judge Saltzman was a corporate restructuring attorney in Los Angeles, spending most of her career with O’Melveny & Myers, LLP. A native of Buffalo, New York, Judge Saltzman received her Bachelor of Arts, Phi Beta Kappa, from Amherst College in 1991 and her Juris Doctor from the University of Virginia, School of Law, in 1996. Since joining the bankruptcy court, Judge Saltzman has served on the Ninth Circuit Wellness Committee and Bankruptcy Judges Education Committee, and participates in training of the bankruptcy court’s law clerks and externs. The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California, the largest bankruptcy court in the nation, reported 21,048 bankruptcy filings in calendar year 2023. The court is authorized 21 judgeships. Bankruptcy judges serve a 14-year renewable term and handle all bankruptcy-related matters under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Judges of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit have statutory responsibility for selecting and appointing bankruptcy judges in the nine western states that comprise the Ninth Circuit. The court uses a comprehensive merit selection process for the initial appointment. For reappointments, the court conducts a performance review and considers public comment evaluations. # # #