Winning–Or at Least Not Losing–On Cross-Examination

Miller, Henry G.

Journal: Pace Law Review

Volume: 33

First Page: 747

Year: 2013

Bluebook Citation: 33 PACE L. REV. 747 (2013)

Author: Henry G. Miller: all 3 publications


Abstract

Cross-examination is, of course, the glamour topic of trial practice. You cannot get people too excited about direct examinations or openings, maybe summations, but cross-examination is the riveting topic; the stuff of which legends are made. It is not always easy, and I am going to give you a few pointers. Now for those who have not tried many cases, you cannot learn to be a cross-examiner by just listening to one person talk.

But what you can do is pick up a few ideas. And as I talk, it is OK to think, “Hey you know; maybe there’s a better way to do it.” Because, what I am telling you, is my way. And, very often, like a surgeon, there are many ways to get out bad tissue, many options, so we trial lawyers have many ways to get at the same result. It is just the way I do it, but you should use your imagination now for how you would deal with the problem.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.