Wills - Revocation by Change in Circumstances - Effect of a Separation and Property Settlement Agreement

Haerle, Paul R.

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 53

First Page: 1018

Year: 1955

Bluebook Citation: 53 MICH. L. REV. 1018 (1955)

Author: Paul R. Haerle: all 5 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
2
Citing decisions
1
Courts citing
Most recently cited by1
  • 1963Vélez Cuebas v. Cancel P.R.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

Testator's will, executed in 1944, named his wife executrix and sole devisee. One month before his death in 1952 he entered into a detailed separation and property settlement agreement with her in which, though not referring directly to the will, the wife released any present, future or after-acquired interest in the same realty as was devised in the will. The widow's offering of the will for probate was contested by the heirs. The lower court directed a verdict for the contestants on the ground that the agreement operated to revoke the will.

On appeal, held, reversed. Since neither a divorce alone nor a property settlement alone will work a revocation by operation of law because of the change in circumstance, a separation and property settlement agreement will not do so. Price v. Price, (Tenn. App. 1954) 269 S.W. (2d) 920.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.