Whose Life Is It Anyway?

Wong, Kam C.

Journal: Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

Volume: 5

First Page: 233

Year: 2006

Bluebook Citation: 5 CARDOZO PUB. L. POL 'Y & ETHICS J. 233 (2006)

Author: Kam C. Wong: all 6 publications


Abstract

The article explores the complex ethical, legal, and societal dimensions of the right-to-die debate, emphasizing the need for a nuanced approach that moves beyond simplistic moral framing. It argues that the debate is inherently exploratory and tentative, shaped by cultural and personal values, and calls for a reassessment of existing perspectives to foster creative solutions. The central thesis underscores the inevitability of euthanasia as a societal issue and advocates for balanced policies that respect individual autonomy while addressing broader societal concerns.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.