When the Teachers and Parents Can't Agree, Who Really Decides - Burdens of Proof and Standards of Review under the Education for All Handicapped Children Act

Guernsey, Thomas F.

Journal: Cleveland State Law Review

Volume: 36

First Page: 67

Year: 1988

Bluebook Citation: 36 CLEV. ST. L. REV. 67 (1988)

Author: Thomas F. Guernsey: all 8 publications


Abstract

Burdens of proof and standards of review can have a significant impact on the outcome of proceedings brought under the Education for All Handicapped Children Act and deserve a more consistently thoughtful approach than has been provided to date. Any confusion that exists may well be the result of courts, including the United States Supreme Court, failing to distinguish the various parts of the administrative process. The simple step of looking realistically at the administrative process (rather than lumping together Local Education Authorities, State Education Authorities, local due process hearings, and state administrative appeals, as the Supreme Court did in Rowley) would be a significant step. A reasoned approach, as outlined in this Article, would be a significant improvement.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.