When Empathy Bites Back: Cautionary Tales from Neuroscience for Capital Sentencing

Johnson, Sheri Lynn, Hritz, Amelia Courtney, Royer, Caisa Elizabeth & Blume, John H.

Journal: Fordham Law Review

Volume: 85

First Page: 573

Year: 2016

Bluebook Citation: 85 FORDHAM L. REV. 573 (2016)

Author: Sheri Lynn Johnson: all 35 publications


Abstract

This Article examines the implications of emerging neuroscientific findings regarding empathy for capital trials. We have approached this task with caution because neuroscientists’ understanding of the human brain is still evolving. As with any new field, if neuroscience is completely trusted before it is thoroughly tested, there is a risk of embracing the new phrenology. Given the state of the research, our advice to defense lawyers is quite modest, but we believe that there are some important lessons for lawyers, judges, legislators, and other stakeholders in the capital punishment system.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.