What's Wrong with Partial Intestacy?

Storrow, Richard F.

Journal: Marquette Law Review

Volume: 100

First Page: 1387

Year: 2017

Bluebook Citation: 100 MARQ. L. REV. 1387 (2017)

Author: Richard F. Storrow: all 17 publications


Abstract

This article questions whether wills law's disapproval of partial intestacy rests on defensible assumptions about testamentary intent. After examining the causes of and antidotes to partial intestacy, I make three primary points. First, the presumption against intestacy applies only to wills that contain an ambiguous bequest of the residue. Second, the law's disapproval of partial intestacy is due in part to its failure to make an important distinction between testamentary intention and dispositive intention.

Third, a theory of passive intention, heretofore barely alluded to in the law of wills, supplies the necessary validation of partially intestate estates.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.