What Is a Fair Price for Objector Blackmail? Class Action Objectors and the 2018 Amendments to Rule 23

Cabraser, Elizabeth J. & Steinman, Adam N.

Journal: Lewis & Clark Law Review

Volume: 24

First Page: 549

Year: 2020

Bluebook Citation: 24 LEWIS & CLARK L. REV. 549 (2020)

Author: Adam N. Steinman: all 17 publications


Abstract

As part of a symposium addressing what the next 50 years might hold for class actions, mass torts, and MDLs, this Article examines a recent amendment to Rule 23 that offers a new solution to the persistent problem of strategic objections. Most significantly, Rule 23 now requires the district judge to approve any payments made to class members in exchange for withdrawing or forgoing challenges to a class action settlement. Although the new provision is still in its infancy, it has already been deployed to thwart improper objector behavior and to bring for-pay objection practice out of the shadows. The 2018 changes—along with other on-the-ground developments—are important steps toward improving the class action settlement process.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.