What Can the United States Learn from English Anti-Suit Injunctions? An American Perspective on Airbus Industrie GIE v. Patel

Kent Anderson

Journal: Yale Journal of International Law

Volume: 25

First Page: 195

Year: 2000

Bluebook Citation: 25 YALE J. INT'L L. 195 (2000)

Author: Kent A. Anderson: all 5 publications


Abstract

This Comment provides a look at the US. legal system through the eyes of England's highest court. Using the House of Lords decision in Airbus Industries GIE v. Patel as a vehicle, this Comment discusses the standard for granting international antisuit injunctions in the United States. Along the way, the Comment also offers some practical lessons regarding complex international litigation drawn from the extensive maneuverings employed in the Airbus case as it traveled through various courts in the United States, India, and England. The Comment concludes by arguing that United States courts should embrace the approach advocated by the House of Lords in Airbus and adopt a strict comity-based standard for granting international anti-suit injunctions.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.