Waiting For Good Dough: Litigation Funding Comes To Law

Gillers, Stephen

Journal: Akron Law Review

Volume: 43

Year: 2010

Bluebook Citation: 43 AKRON L. REV. (2010)

Author: Stephen F. Gillers: all 25 publications


Abstract

In this Article, I want to examine Rancman. The court’s treatment of one issue it raised—the question of champerty —is myopic, hostile, and superficial. The resolution of this issue on the facts before the court promotes injustice. The court introduced the issue into the case without the benefit of briefing.

The Ohio legislature has since overruled Rancman. There is reason to believe that the Ohio Supreme Court will defer to the legislation, although we cannot know for certain until it addresses the question, as discussed.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.