Voluntary Dismissals, Jurisdiction & Waiving Appellate Review

Lammon, Bryan

Journal: University of Cincinnati Law Review

Volume: 92

First Page: 394

Year: 2023

Bluebook Citation: 92 U. CIN. L. REV. 394 (2023)

Author: Bryan D. Lammon: all 13 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
1
Citing decision
1
Courts citing
Most recently cited by1
  • 2024New York State Telecommunications Association, Inc. v. James 2d Cir.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

Litigants have long tried to manufacture a final, appealable decision by voluntarily dismissing their claims after an adverse interlocutory decision. Recently—and especially since the Supreme Court’s decision in Microsoft Corp. v. Baker—courts have thought that these dismissals created a jurisdictional problem. Either the voluntary dismissal did not produce a final decision, or the dismissal extinguished Article III jurisdiction. But the problem with these appeals is not jurisdictional.

It’s waiver. A voluntary dismissal after an adverse interlocutory decision waives the right to appellate review. This Article shows the flaws in the jurisdictional rejection of this kind of manufactured finality and offers a much simpler reason for barring them. So when this issue makes its way back before the Supreme Court, the Court should recognize what the issue is, has been, and should remain: an issue of waiver.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.