Virginia is for (Lovers) Business Owners who Feel the Human Rights Commission Poses a Threat to Their Religious Liberties

Miller, Sarah

Journal: William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice

Volume: 14

First Page: 659

Year: 2008

Bluebook Citation: 14 WM. & MARY J. RACE GENDER & SOC. JUST. 659 (2008)

Author: Sarah M. Miller: all 5 publications


Abstract

In November 1992, the Arlington County Board voted to add "sexual orientation" to the group of classes protected under its antidiscrimination policy. When a store owner was sued for violating this policy in 2006, he countersued, claiming that Arlington did not have the power to enact such a policy. His claim was based on the existence of a strongly state-centered power hierarchy unique to a very small minority of states, including Virginia, laid out in the Dillon Rule. Virginia's use of the Dillon Rule basically cripples its municipal corporations by injecting uncertainty into the process of enacting local legislation and by making local leaders reticent to enact progressive measures lest they be challenged or overruled outright.

In effect, this seemingly innocuous and outdated power hierarchy has stunted civil rights movements, specifically the gay rights movement, in Virginia and should be eradicated.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.