USURY AND PURCHASES ON CREDIT

Christensen S.Ed., Harold G.

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 49

First Page: 1087

Year: 1951

Bluebook Citation: 49 MICH. L. REV. 1087 (1951)

Author: Harold G. Christensen S Ed: all 4 publications


Abstract

Defendant purchased goods of the plaintiff on credit, giving his note, secured by a chattel mortgage, for the balance of the purchase price. The total price included a "time price differential" which exceeded the lawful rate of interest computed on the unpaid balance. Defendant defaulted in payment of the note and plaintiff sued to recover the goods. Defendant pleaded that the mortgage and note included usurious interest.

Held, there was a bona fide sale on credit and the note was not usurious. Brown v. Crandall, (S.C. 1950) 61 S.E. (2d) 761.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.