Unemployment Compensation during Labor Disputes
Haggart Jr., Virgil J.
Citation analytics
How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Citations by decade
Courts citing this journal article
Most recently cited by4
- 1979In re Sarvis N.C.
- 1977Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory U.S.
- 1975F. R. Orr Construction Co. v. Industrial Commission Colo.
- 1964Wheeler v. Director of the Division of Employment Security Mass.
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Abstract
I. Survey of Federal and State Legislation II. Object and Purpose of Unemployment Compensation Legislation … A. Federal Legislation … B. State Legislation III. Labor Dispute Disqualification Provisions … A. Survey of Labor-Dispute Disqualification Provisions … 1. “Stoppage of Work” … 2. “Labor Dispute” … 3. Removal of Disqualification … 4. “Participating” in Labor Dispute … 5. “Financing” the Labor Dispute … 6. “Directly Interested” in the Labor Dispute … 7. Same “Grade or Class” … B. Tradition of Neutrality of the Stat in Labor Disputes … 1. British Legislation and Experience … 2. Doctrine of Neutrality of the State in the United States … C. Application of Labor-Dispute Disqualification Provisions to Modern Collective Bargaining Conditions … 1. Summary of Application of Labor-Dispute Provisions … 2. Special Problems IV. Conclusion Appendix: Labor-Dispute Disqualification Provisions of State Unemployment Compensation Laws