Truth or Consequences? The Inadequacy of Consequentialist Arguments Against Multicultural Relativism

Hills Jr., Roderick M.

Journal: Constitutional Commentary

Volume: 15

First Page: 185

Year: 1998

Bluebook Citation: 15 CONST. COMMENT. 185 (1998)

Author: Roderick M. Hills Jr: all 14 publications


Abstract

Truth or Consequences? The Inadequacy of Consequentialist Arguments Against Multicultural Relativism: a review essay of: Beyond all reason: the radical assault on truth in American law. By Daniel Farber & Suzanna Sherry. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

1997. Pp. 208.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.