Toward a New Dynamic in Poverty Client Empowerment: The Rhetoric, Politics, and Therapeutics of Opening Statements in Social Security Disability Hearings

Linda Durston & Linda Mills

Journal: Yale Journal of Law & Feminism

Volume: 8

First Page: 119

Year: 1997

Bluebook Citation: 8 YALE J. L. & FEMINISM 119 (1997)

Author: Linda G. Mills: all 4 publications


Abstract

The Social Security Administration's Hearings, Appeals, and Litigation Law Manual states that its Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) should make opening statements in Social Security disability hearings. While the matter is not formally prescribed one way or another, ALs also typically invite claimant representatives-the advocates and attorneys who assist claimants in presenting their evidence before ALJs-to make opening statements. Despite this incentive to introduce remarks in disability hearings, a study of sixty-seven transcripts from Social Security disability hearings conducted in three major U.S. cities found that Social Security ALJs in 72 % of the cases reviewed either gave no opening statement or gave an incomplete one. A review of these same transcripts shows that claimant representatives almost without exception declined to introduce their arguments and analyses.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.