Tortious Interference: The Limits of Common Law Liability for Newsgathering

Baron, Sandra S., Lane, Hilary & Schulz, David A.

Journal: William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

Volume: 4

First Page: 1027

Year: 1996

Bluebook Citation: 4 WM. & MARY BILL RTS. J. 1027 (1996)

Author: Sandra S. Baron: all 1 publication


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
2
Citing decisions
2
Courts citing

Citations by decade

1
1
2000s2010s

Courts citing this journal article

Cal. App. Ct.1
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.1
Most recently cited by2
  • 2019Jenni Rivera Enters., LLC v. Latin World Entm't Holdings, Inc. Cal. App. Ct.
  • 2001Seminole Tribe v. Times Publishing Co. Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

Media lawyers have recently been confronted with a relatively new source of litigation: the tort of intentional interference with contractual relations, which arises out of confidentiality agreements. In this Article, the authors identify the elements of tortious interference with contracts and examine the key issues presented when this tort is applied to newsgathering. The authors then consider a potential defense based on the First Amendment. In light of the public and constitutional interests at stake, the authors conclude that the breach of a confidentiality agreement should not sustain a tortious interference claim when the press is involved in newsgathering activity.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.