Timber Deeds—A Case for the Restatement of the Law of Property
Luccock, Eugene C.
Citation analytics
How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Courts citing this journal article
Most recently cited by2
- 1978Layman v. Ledgett Wash.
- 1977Layman v. Ledgett Wash. Ct. App.
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Abstract
Presumably, to a lumberman, a manufacturer, a wage earner or an investor a stand of trees is just a given number of trees of various types, or, perhaps better, a given quantity in board feet of merchantable lumber, which can be profitably converted into money as and when proximity to market and market price permit. More broadly, to a conservationist, trees in various stages of growth are national assets capable of continuous reproduction and the source of a constant as well as an immediate supply of material for structural and other uses. These differences in approach aside, and leaving out of account the relation of forests to water supply and the value of trees in preventing soil erosion, it is obvious that timber is a consumable commodity. Yet, in contrast with coal, iron, oil and other mineral content of the soil, trees are a product and not a part of the soil; they occupy space, but their removal does not leave an emptiness for which no particular use has been discovered as is the case in mining operations; rather, when the timber is cut, the removal releases the soil for a further growth of timber, or for agriculture, or for building.