Through the Judicial Looking Glass: The Nebraska Supreme Court in Moral Obligation Land and What It Thought It Saw There

Killenbeck, Mark R.

Journal: Nebraska Law Review

Volume: 71

Year: 1992

Bluebook Citation: 71 NEB. L. REV. (1992)

Author: Mark R. Killenbeck: all 13 publications


Abstract

I. Introduction II. Setting the Stage: The Commonwealth Fiasco III. Closing the Show: The Haman Decision IV. What's a Word? Judicial Technique In Haman ... A. And Versus Or: Basting the State Goose ... B. And Versus Or: Cooking the Judicial Gander V. Changing the Rules: Classifications in a Post-Haman World ... A. Classifications and Haman: Fashioning a New Rule ... B. Classifications and Haman: Applying the Rule ... C. "Permanently Closed Classes": Myths and Realities VI. Stating the Rules: Moral Obligations and the Moral Society ... A. Wakeley: When Is a "Rule" Really a Rule? ... B. Moral Obligation in Nebraska: The Pre-Haman View ... C. When Is a Guaranty Not a Guaranty: Weaver and Hubbell Bank … D. Moral Obligation in a Post-Haman World: The Rebirth of Liberty of Contract and the Demise of Compassion VII. Justifying the Rules: The Haman Court's Vision of Judicial Review ... A. A Most Dangerous Branch: Public Policy and the Haman Court ... B. No State Is an Island? ... 1. "The Credit of the State" ... 2. Moral Obligation: A National Perspective ... 3. Redemption of Deposits: The Lessons from Other States VIII. Conclusion

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.