Threats to Contraception

Deborah Tuerkheimer, Stanford Law Review & The Stanford Law Review

Journal: Stanford Law Review

Volume: 75

First Page: 1233

Year: 2025

Bluebook Citation: 75 STAN. L. REV. 1233 (2025)

Author: Deborah Tuerkheimer: all 16 publications


Abstract

Many question the future of the right to contraception after Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, but Deborah Tuerkheimer argues that the more immediate threats lie beyond the Supreme Court. Contraceptive access is eroding through three interconnected forces: post-Dobbs funding cuts and clinic closures, expanding parental- and conscience-based claims, and misinformation-driven cultural shifts that invite restrictive regulation. Together, these developments imperil contraception even as formal protections remain intact.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.