Threats and Safeguards in the Determination of Auditor Independence

Allen, William T. & Siegel, Arthur

Journal: Washington University Law Review

Volume: 80

First Page: 519

Year: 2002

Bluebook Citation: 80 WASH. U. L. REV. 519 (2002)

Author: William T. Allen: all 6 publications


Abstract

The Article that follows was written before enactment into law of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. It attempts a brief explication of an existing conceptual framework for determining issues of auditor independence: that of the staff of the Independence Standards Board and suggests that approach is a much sounder way to address remaining issues of auditor independence than the approach reflected in the existing SEC Rule. Because the new Public Company Accounting Oversight Board is charged with addressing issues of auditor independence it will have to try to think conceptually about what we want from a requirement of auditor independence and what we are willing to forego in order to have it. The SEC should encourage it to do so and allow it to replace the political comprise of the existing Rule.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.