THEORY OF PLEADING A SURVEY INCLUDING THE FEDERAL RULES

Blume, William Wirt

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 47

First Page: 297

Year: 1949

Bluebook Citation: 47 MICH. L. REV. 297 (1949)

Author: William Wirt Blume: all 40 publications


Abstract

In an often-quoted report of a committee of the American Bar Association, Roscoe Pound stated: "Pleadings have four purposes: (1) The first is to serve as a formal basis for the judgment. This is the oldest function, and one that goes back before the time of rational, as distinguished from purely mechanical trial of issues. . . . (2) Another is to separate issues of fact from questions of law .... (3) Another is to give litigants the advantage of a plea of res judicata if molested again for the same cause ....

(4) Finally, pleadings exist to notify parties of the claims, defenses and cross-demands of their adversaries . . . . The notice-function of pleading is the one that should be emphasized. The function of serving as a formal basis for the judgment should be abandoned, and the other functions will be performed at least as well as now if the notice-function is thoroughly developed and consistently adhered to." A brief history of each of these functions will serve as an outline of the history and theory of pleading in Anglo-American law.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.