The Written Description Requirement

Sterne, Robert Greene, Garrett, Patrick E. & Wood, Theodore A.

Journal: Akron Law Review

Volume: 37

Year: 2004

Bluebook Citation: 37 AKRON L. REV. (2004)

Author: Theodore A. Wood: all 2 publications


Abstract

It is now well accepted that this provision of the 1952 Patent Act (Patent Act) includes a written description requirement that is separate and distinct from the enablement requirement. Thus, a specification may enable one of ordinary skill to make or use a claimed invention, but still not adequately describe the invention in a way that the public knows that the inventor was in possession of the claimed invention at the time of filing the application. For example, a patent specification that discloses various patterns of eight wooden shingles, does not necessarily provide written description for a claim amendment that recites “at least six shingles,” even though the specification would enable one so inclined to construct a panel of at least six wooden shingles. However, it was not entirely clear from the language of the Patent Act itself that there was a written description requirement separate and distinct from the enablement requirement.

The well-accepted understanding that these are separate and distinct requirements flows from judicial decisions, and not the text of the Patent Act itself.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.