The "Watchman for Truth": Professional Licensing and the First Amendment

Kry, Robert

Journal: Seattle University Law Review

Volume: 23

First Page: 885

Year: 2000

Bluebook Citation: 23 SEATTLE U. L. REV. 885 (2000)

Author: Robert K. Kry: all 6 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
2
Citing decisions
1
Courts citing
Most recently cited by2
  • 2026Chiles v. Salazar Revisions: 3/31/26 SCOTUS
  • 2026Chiles v. Salazar SCOTUS

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

This Article addresses a particular aspect of many kinds of professional practice: the rendering of advice to clients. Drawing on their knowledge and experience, professionals may recommend a certain course of action to their clients in the course of their practice. The client may then assess the recommendation and decide whether or not to act on it. This aspect of professional practice involves a speech-related activity, so government regulation might raise at least a colorable First Amendment issue.

This Article also focuses on a particular aspect of the regulation of professional advice, namely, licensure. When professional advice rendering activities are covered by a system of licensure, particularly acute First Amendment questions arise because the license requirement arguably acts as a prior restraint on speech. A prior restraint is a legal requirement that an individual obtain permission from the government before speaking.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.