The UPC Substituted Judgment/Best Interest Standard for Guardian Decisions: A Proposal for Reform

Forlik, Lawrence A. & Whitton, Linda S.

Journal: University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

Volume: 45

First Page: 739

Year: 2012

Bluebook Citation: 45 U. MICH. J. L. REFORM 739 (2012)

Author: Linda S. Whitton: all 4 publications


Abstract

The introduction in 1997 of "substituted judgment" as a guiding principle for guardian decisions was a key contribution of the UPC to guardianship reform. The current UPC Section 5-314(a) instructs guardians to "consider the expressed desires and personal values of the ward" when making decisions and to "at all times ... act in the ward's best interest." This dual mandate for guardian decisions was intended to promote the self-determination interests of incapacitated adults. This Article argues that in practice the standard has failed to achieve this goal. It analyzes the shortcomings of UPC Section 5-314(a) and other statutory decision-making standards and offers an improved decision-making model.

Frolik and Wiitton propose reform of Section 5-314(a) to provide better guidance for guardians, and to harmonize the standard for guardian decisions with other surrogate decision-making standards within the UPC.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.