THE SUPREME COURT'S CONSTRUCTION OF THE SELF-INCRIMINATION CLAUSE
Corwin, Edward S.
Citation analytics
How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Citations by decade
Courts citing this journal article
Most recently cited by9
- 2020State v. Robert Andrews (082209) (Essex County & Statewide) N.J.
- 1973State v. McKenzie Md. Ct. Spec. App.
- 1965State v. Bisaccia N.J.
- 1956Schwinger Appeal Pa. Super. Ct.
- 1956Bailey v. Muse Miss.
- 1955State v. Fary N.J.
- 1953Batalla v. Tribunal de Distrito de San Juan P.R.
- 1953Cirilo Batalla v. District Court of San Juan P.R.
- 1951Rogers v. United States U.S.
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Abstract
The Fourth Amendment of the Constitution reads as follows: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the person or things to be seized." The so-called "self-incrimination clause" of Amendment V reads as follows: "No person * * * shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself."