The Supreme Court Fails to Decide the Inverse Condemnation Issue: MacDonald, Sommer & Frates v. Yolo County

Durham, James Geoffrey

Journal: Urban Law Annual ; Journal of Urban and Contemporary Law

Volume: 32

First Page: 69

Year: 1987

Bluebook Citation: 32 URB. L. ANN.; J. URB. & CONTEMP. L. 69 (1987)

Author: James Geoffrey Durham: all 10 publications


Abstract

The purpose of this Article is to review and organize the current law of inverse condemnation in light of MacDonald. First this Article briefly reviews the origin of inverse condemnation and the tangled web woven by the Court in Agins, San Diego Gas, and Hamilton Bank. Second, the Article reviews MacDonald and the state of the law after MacDonald. Finally, the Article provides some insight into what action can be expected from the Court on inverse condemnation and finishes with some practical considerations for current land use disputes.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.