The Supreme Court and Labor Dispute Arbitration: the Emerging Federal Law

Smith, Russell A. & Jones, Dallas L.

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 63

First Page: 751

Year: 1965

Bluebook Citation: 63 MICH. L. REV. 751 (1965)

Author: Russell A. Smith: all 20 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
3
Citing decisions
3
Courts citing

Citations by decade

2
1
1960s1970s

Courts citing this journal article

N.H.1
P.R.1
Wis.1
Most recently cited by3

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

Within the past few years, the United States Supreme Court has handed down a number of decisions of great significance to the labor dispute arbitration process. Some have been concerned with problems of arbitrability or arbitral authority; others with the availability and exclusivity of the arbitration process vis-a-vis alternative legal remedies for breach of the labor agreement; and still others with the effect of a breach of obligation by one party to the labor agreement upon the obligations of the other party. We propose in this article to analyze these decisions, to attempt to categorize the different kinds of challenges to arbitral jurisdiction or authority which can be made, and to assess, insofar as this may be done, the import of the Court's decisions for the arbitration process. In a sense, we shall be dealing with the extent to which, under developing federal law, judicial review of the arbitration process is available.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.