The Still-Dwindled <em>Revlon</em>

Johnson, Lyman P.Q. & Ricca, Robert

Journal: Washington and Lee Law Review Online

Volume: 71

First Page: 150

Year: 2014

Bluebook Citation: 71 WASH. & LEE L. REV. ONLINE 150 (2014)

Author: Lyman P. Q. Johnson: all 25 publications


Abstract

This is a brief Response to Professor Mohsen Manesh’s extensive response to our original article, The Dwindling of Revlon. Our thesis is that today the iconic Revlon doctrine is, remedially, quite substantially diminished. Although Professor Manesh sets out to establish what he calls “the limits of Johnson’s and Ricca’s thesis,” we here maintain, as before, that there is little remedial clout to Revlon unless directors or others very significantly misbehave. We also criticize Delaware’s continuing use of the standard-of-conduct/standard-of-review construct in the fiduciary duty area.

This rubric is unhelpful generally and strikingly so in the Revlon setting, as we note.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.