The Shortest Distance: Direct Filing and Choice of Law in Multidistrict Litigation

Bradt, Andrew D.

Journal: Notre Dame Law Review

Volume: 88

First Page: 759

Year: 2012

Bluebook Citation: 88 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 759 (2012)

Author: Andrew D. Bradt: all 15 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
4
Citing decisions
2
Courts citing

Courts citing this journal article

7th Cir.3
S.D. Ohio1
Most recently cited by4
  • 2023Teresa Sykes v. Cook Incorporated 7th Cir.
  • 2023Shirley Parton v. Cook Medical, LLC 7th Cir.
  • 2021Victoria Looper v. Cook Incorporated 7th Cir.
  • 2020Harris v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company S.D. Ohio

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court's approach in two cases Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Elec. Mfg. Co. and Van Dusen v. Barrack, regarding direct filing, aggregation litigation and choice of law in multidistrict litigation (MDL). It mentions that MDL is very high in federal courts specifically in places of mass wrongdoings or product liability.

It explores that the traditional MDL framework is more appropriate with the policies underlying in these cases than the class action.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.