The SEC, Administrative Usurpation, and Insider Trading

A.C. Pritchard, Stanford Law Review & The Stanford Law Review

Journal: Stanford Law Review

Volume: 69

First Page: 1

Year: 2016

Bluebook Citation: 69 STAN. L. REV. 1 (2016)

Author: Adam C. Pritchard: all 25 publications


Abstract

The history of insider trading law is a tale of administrative usurpation and legislative acquiescence. Congress has never enacted a prohibition against insider trading, much less defined it. Instead, the SEC has led in defining insider trading, albeit without the formality of rulemaking, and subject to varying degrees of oversight by the courts. The reason […]

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.